oliverdavies.uk/content/node.050525d7-3275-486e-8f0e-9548aa81a156.json

91 lines
No EOL
3.9 KiB
JSON

{
"uuid": [
{
"value": "050525d7-3275-486e-8f0e-9548aa81a156"
}
],
"langcode": [
{
"value": "en"
}
],
"type": [
{
"target_id": "daily_email",
"target_type": "node_type",
"target_uuid": "8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7"
}
],
"revision_timestamp": [
{
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:34+00:00"
}
],
"revision_uid": [
{
"target_type": "user",
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
}
],
"revision_log": [],
"status": [
{
"value": true
}
],
"uid": [
{
"target_type": "user",
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
}
],
"title": [
{
"value": "Pull requests are great for open-source, but not for teams\n"
}
],
"created": [
{
"value": "2023-08-27T00:00:00+00:00"
}
],
"changed": [
{
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:34+00:00"
}
],
"promote": [
{
"value": false
}
],
"sticky": [
{
"value": false
}
],
"default_langcode": [
{
"value": true
}
],
"revision_translation_affected": [
{
"value": true
}
],
"path": [
{
"alias": "\/daily\/2023\/08\/27\/pull-requests-are-great-for-open-source",
"langcode": "en"
}
],
"body": [
{
"value": "\n <p>Code review with pull and merge requests is great for open-source but not for development teams or soloists.<\/p>\n\n<p>On an open-source project, the code changes are most likely being submitted by someone you don't know and don't work with regularly, so having a step to review the code prior to merging it and decide if you want to take on the responsibility of maintaining it is a big decision.<\/p>\n\n<p>On a development team, you work closely with the person submitting the change request and you have a shared responsibility and ownership of the code being added. The person isn't going to submit their change and not be seen again.<\/p>\n\n<p>It takes time for code to be reviewed, which means it takes longer for the change to be released to users.<\/p>\n\n<p>If you're a soloist, are you going to submit a request for you to review your own code?<\/p>\n\n<p>If you don't need to do code review on your team, do you need to create feature or topic branches?<\/p>\n\n<p>I'd suggest sticking to one canonical branch and doing trunk-based development instead.<\/p>\n\n ",
"format": "full_html",
"processed": "\n <p>Code review with pull and merge requests is great for open-source but not for development teams or soloists.<\/p>\n\n<p>On an open-source project, the code changes are most likely being submitted by someone you don't know and don't work with regularly, so having a step to review the code prior to merging it and decide if you want to take on the responsibility of maintaining it is a big decision.<\/p>\n\n<p>On a development team, you work closely with the person submitting the change request and you have a shared responsibility and ownership of the code being added. The person isn't going to submit their change and not be seen again.<\/p>\n\n<p>It takes time for code to be reviewed, which means it takes longer for the change to be released to users.<\/p>\n\n<p>If you're a soloist, are you going to submit a request for you to review your own code?<\/p>\n\n<p>If you don't need to do code review on your team, do you need to create feature or topic branches?<\/p>\n\n<p>I'd suggest sticking to one canonical branch and doing trunk-based development instead.<\/p>\n\n ",
"summary": null
}
]
}