{ "uuid": [ { "value": "050525d7-3275-486e-8f0e-9548aa81a156" } ], "langcode": [ { "value": "en" } ], "type": [ { "target_id": "daily_email", "target_type": "node_type", "target_uuid": "8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7" } ], "revision_timestamp": [ { "value": "2025-05-11T09:00:34+00:00" } ], "revision_uid": [ { "target_type": "user", "target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849" } ], "revision_log": [], "status": [ { "value": true } ], "uid": [ { "target_type": "user", "target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849" } ], "title": [ { "value": "Pull requests are great for open-source, but not for teams\n" } ], "created": [ { "value": "2023-08-27T00:00:00+00:00" } ], "changed": [ { "value": "2025-05-11T09:00:34+00:00" } ], "promote": [ { "value": false } ], "sticky": [ { "value": false } ], "default_langcode": [ { "value": true } ], "revision_translation_affected": [ { "value": true } ], "path": [ { "alias": "\/daily\/2023\/08\/27\/pull-requests-are-great-for-open-source", "langcode": "en" } ], "body": [ { "value": "\n
Code review with pull and merge requests is great for open-source but not for development teams or soloists.<\/p>\n\n
On an open-source project, the code changes are most likely being submitted by someone you don't know and don't work with regularly, so having a step to review the code prior to merging it and decide if you want to take on the responsibility of maintaining it is a big decision.<\/p>\n\n
On a development team, you work closely with the person submitting the change request and you have a shared responsibility and ownership of the code being added. The person isn't going to submit their change and not be seen again.<\/p>\n\n
It takes time for code to be reviewed, which means it takes longer for the change to be released to users.<\/p>\n\n
If you're a soloist, are you going to submit a request for you to review your own code?<\/p>\n\n
If you don't need to do code review on your team, do you need to create feature or topic branches?<\/p>\n\n
I'd suggest sticking to one canonical branch and doing trunk-based development instead.<\/p>\n\n ", "format": "full_html", "processed": "\n
Code review with pull and merge requests is great for open-source but not for development teams or soloists.<\/p>\n\n
On an open-source project, the code changes are most likely being submitted by someone you don't know and don't work with regularly, so having a step to review the code prior to merging it and decide if you want to take on the responsibility of maintaining it is a big decision.<\/p>\n\n
On a development team, you work closely with the person submitting the change request and you have a shared responsibility and ownership of the code being added. The person isn't going to submit their change and not be seen again.<\/p>\n\n
It takes time for code to be reviewed, which means it takes longer for the change to be released to users.<\/p>\n\n
If you're a soloist, are you going to submit a request for you to review your own code?<\/p>\n\n
If you don't need to do code review on your team, do you need to create feature or topic branches?<\/p>\n\n
I'd suggest sticking to one canonical branch and doing trunk-based development instead.<\/p>\n\n ", "summary": null } ] }