100 lines
No EOL
5.1 KiB
JSON
100 lines
No EOL
5.1 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"uuid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "53d1af45-bb51-4e4a-a2b9-b732bc9dc8ea"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "en"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"type": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_id": "daily_email",
|
|
"target_type": "node_type",
|
|
"target_uuid": "8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_timestamp": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:10+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_log": [],
|
|
"status": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"title": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "Dead or done"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"created": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2024-06-14T00:00:00+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"changed": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:10+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"promote": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"sticky": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"default_langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_translation_affected": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"path": [
|
|
{
|
|
"alias": "\/daily\/2024\/06\/14\/dead-or-done",
|
|
"langcode": "en"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"body": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "\n <p>Yesterday, I wrote about <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oliverdavies.uk\/daily\/2024\/06\/13\/vetting-third-party-open-source-software\">some things I look for when evaluating open-source projects<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<p>One thing I said was \"When was the most recent commit and release?\".<\/p>\n\n<p>If a project hasn't had many recent commits, it could be outdated or no longer supported.<\/p>\n\n<p>Alternatively, it could be considered feature complete and not getting new features, and only getting bug fixes and maintenance updates.<\/p>\n\n<p>I see this a lot with Vim plugins that were written several years ago and are now minimally maintained and updated, but getting no new features.<\/p>\n\n<p>This happens in the Drupal space, too, when people wrote a module for a project which they have since completed, or no longer work with that client or for that company.<\/p>\n\n<p>If there are at least commits for security compatibility, such as new versions of PHP or node, that's a sign the project is in a maintenance phase.<\/p>\n\n<p>If there are no recent commits, the project could be dead and I'd carefully consider if you want to add or use it.<\/p>\n\n<p>Something that could help is if maintainers are explicit about what state their project is in.<\/p>\n\n<p>Add a note to the README.md or CONTRIBUTING.md file saying if the project is feature complete or what the maintenance state is.<\/p>\n\n<p>If the project is no longer maintained, you can also document it and potentially archive the repository too to show that it will no longer be updated and to avoid confusion.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"format": "full_html",
|
|
"processed": "\n <p>Yesterday, I wrote about <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oliverdavies.uk\/daily\/2024\/06\/13\/vetting-third-party-open-source-software\">some things I look for when evaluating open-source projects<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<p>One thing I said was \"When was the most recent commit and release?\".<\/p>\n\n<p>If a project hasn't had many recent commits, it could be outdated or no longer supported.<\/p>\n\n<p>Alternatively, it could be considered feature complete and not getting new features, and only getting bug fixes and maintenance updates.<\/p>\n\n<p>I see this a lot with Vim plugins that were written several years ago and are now minimally maintained and updated, but getting no new features.<\/p>\n\n<p>This happens in the Drupal space, too, when people wrote a module for a project which they have since completed, or no longer work with that client or for that company.<\/p>\n\n<p>If there are at least commits for security compatibility, such as new versions of PHP or node, that's a sign the project is in a maintenance phase.<\/p>\n\n<p>If there are no recent commits, the project could be dead and I'd carefully consider if you want to add or use it.<\/p>\n\n<p>Something that could help is if maintainers are explicit about what state their project is in.<\/p>\n\n<p>Add a note to the README.md or CONTRIBUTING.md file saying if the project is feature complete or what the maintenance state is.<\/p>\n\n<p>If the project is no longer maintained, you can also document it and potentially archive the repository too to show that it will no longer be updated and to avoid confusion.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"summary": null
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"feeds_item": [
|
|
{
|
|
"imported": "1970-01-01T00:33:45+00:00",
|
|
"guid": null,
|
|
"hash": "5b8c0219dc018568e03908b9744aff46",
|
|
"target_type": "feeds_feed",
|
|
"target_uuid": "90c85284-7ca8-4074-9178-97ff8384fe76"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
} |