100 lines
No EOL
3.9 KiB
JSON
100 lines
No EOL
3.9 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"uuid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "c2315804-efa4-4b5e-ae67-41457d8cd8c8"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "en"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"type": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_id": "daily_email",
|
|
"target_type": "node_type",
|
|
"target_uuid": "8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_timestamp": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:22+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_log": [],
|
|
"status": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"title": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "Tests can assert multiple things"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"created": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2024-01-19T00:00:00+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"changed": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:22+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"promote": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"sticky": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"default_langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_translation_affected": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"path": [
|
|
{
|
|
"alias": "\/daily\/2024\/01\/19\/tests-can-assert-multiple-things",
|
|
"langcode": "en"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"body": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "\n <p>Similar to \"a method should only have one return statement\", I've seen similar advice when working with tests: \"Tests should only have a single assertion\".<\/p>\n\n<p>I don't think this is true, and in my experience, you need multiple assertions to have a thorough test.<\/p>\n\n<p>And, whilst similar assertions add some duplication, they can make the intent clearer and give better error messages.<\/p>\n\n<p>Instead, I focus on one test case per test.<\/p>\n\n<p>If I'm testing the following:<\/p>\n\n<ul>\n<li>A blog page exists.<\/li>\n<li>Only post nodes are visible.<\/li>\n<li>Only published posts are visible,<\/li>\n<li>Posts are returned in a specified order.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p>These will be split into separate tests - making it easier to read and maintain the code and have faster execution times by running only the tests I want with the minimum amount of code in each - regardless of how many assertions are in each.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"format": "full_html",
|
|
"processed": "\n <p>Similar to \"a method should only have one return statement\", I've seen similar advice when working with tests: \"Tests should only have a single assertion\".<\/p>\n\n<p>I don't think this is true, and in my experience, you need multiple assertions to have a thorough test.<\/p>\n\n<p>And, whilst similar assertions add some duplication, they can make the intent clearer and give better error messages.<\/p>\n\n<p>Instead, I focus on one test case per test.<\/p>\n\n<p>If I'm testing the following:<\/p>\n\n<ul>\n<li>A blog page exists.<\/li>\n<li>Only post nodes are visible.<\/li>\n<li>Only published posts are visible,<\/li>\n<li>Posts are returned in a specified order.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p>These will be split into separate tests - making it easier to read and maintain the code and have faster execution times by running only the tests I want with the minimum amount of code in each - regardless of how many assertions are in each.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"summary": null
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"feeds_item": [
|
|
{
|
|
"imported": "1970-01-01T00:33:45+00:00",
|
|
"guid": null,
|
|
"hash": "2961539db053ecb851f7ff74172acc9b",
|
|
"target_type": "feeds_feed",
|
|
"target_uuid": "90c85284-7ca8-4074-9178-97ff8384fe76"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
} |