100 lines
No EOL
6 KiB
JSON
100 lines
No EOL
6 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"uuid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "3faefe1b-3c1d-47e6-93d5-dbdd17f2e4fe"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "en"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"type": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_id": "daily_email",
|
|
"target_type": "node_type",
|
|
"target_uuid": "8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_timestamp": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:51+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_log": [],
|
|
"status": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"title": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "Doing the simplest possible thing\n"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"created": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2022-11-24T00:00:00+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"changed": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:51+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"promote": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"sticky": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"default_langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_translation_affected": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"path": [
|
|
{
|
|
"alias": "\/daily\/2022\/11\/24\/doing-the-simplest-possible-thing",
|
|
"langcode": "en"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"body": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "\n <p>I spent most of today working on some code I wrote for the first phase of a client project a few months ago.<\/p>\n\n<p>The previous version used hard-coded data within a Vue.js application, which was sufficient for the previous criteria and in line with the lean approach we decided to take.<\/p>\n\n<p>It was the simplest thing that worked.<\/p>\n\n<p>A new requirement means that the hard-coded data no longer works, so I need to refactor and enhance the code to work with different configurations. I have a proof of concept of this working using JSON from an API endpoint, but I would also like to use a static JSON file when needed for local development.<\/p>\n\n<p>I experimented with a few different ways to approach this before asking myself, \"What's the simplest possible thing I can do to get this working?\".<\/p>\n\n<p>I already knew that I needed to make a change to the structure of the data, which I was able to do quickly with the hard-coded data that I already had, and whilst a static JSON file would be a nice-to-have, I could quickly move the hard-coded data into the API endpoint that I'd already created and continue building on my proof of concept.<\/p>\n\n<p>The idea of \"What's the simplest thing?\" is something that I use regularly.<\/p>\n\n<p>When teaching or coaching test-driven development, I want to write the smallest failing test and then find the quickest and simplest way to get it to pass - even if it means returning a hard-coded value for now.<\/p>\n\n<p>When working on development tasks, I like to break things down as much as possible and find the smallest thing I can do, commit, and push. This gets the ball rolling, and then I repeat the process.<\/p>\n\n<p>Even when writing an email or blog post, once I start writing, it's much easier to continue once I'm in the flow.<\/p>\n\n<p>Taking the simplest approach and not making assumptions about future requirements or scope means less and more maintainable code, as well as being a productivity hack.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"format": "full_html",
|
|
"processed": "\n <p>I spent most of today working on some code I wrote for the first phase of a client project a few months ago.<\/p>\n\n<p>The previous version used hard-coded data within a Vue.js application, which was sufficient for the previous criteria and in line with the lean approach we decided to take.<\/p>\n\n<p>It was the simplest thing that worked.<\/p>\n\n<p>A new requirement means that the hard-coded data no longer works, so I need to refactor and enhance the code to work with different configurations. I have a proof of concept of this working using JSON from an API endpoint, but I would also like to use a static JSON file when needed for local development.<\/p>\n\n<p>I experimented with a few different ways to approach this before asking myself, \"What's the simplest possible thing I can do to get this working?\".<\/p>\n\n<p>I already knew that I needed to make a change to the structure of the data, which I was able to do quickly with the hard-coded data that I already had, and whilst a static JSON file would be a nice-to-have, I could quickly move the hard-coded data into the API endpoint that I'd already created and continue building on my proof of concept.<\/p>\n\n<p>The idea of \"What's the simplest thing?\" is something that I use regularly.<\/p>\n\n<p>When teaching or coaching test-driven development, I want to write the smallest failing test and then find the quickest and simplest way to get it to pass - even if it means returning a hard-coded value for now.<\/p>\n\n<p>When working on development tasks, I like to break things down as much as possible and find the smallest thing I can do, commit, and push. This gets the ball rolling, and then I repeat the process.<\/p>\n\n<p>Even when writing an email or blog post, once I start writing, it's much easier to continue once I'm in the flow.<\/p>\n\n<p>Taking the simplest approach and not making assumptions about future requirements or scope means less and more maintainable code, as well as being a productivity hack.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"summary": null
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"feeds_item": [
|
|
{
|
|
"imported": "1970-01-01T00:33:45+00:00",
|
|
"guid": null,
|
|
"hash": "70b03f1c2962ba75e6f89142c23c6791",
|
|
"target_type": "feeds_feed",
|
|
"target_uuid": "90c85284-7ca8-4074-9178-97ff8384fe76"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
} |