100 lines
No EOL
3.9 KiB
JSON
100 lines
No EOL
3.9 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"uuid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "34be6fed-cd1a-4796-adb8-577340a359b4"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "en"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"type": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_id": "daily_email",
|
|
"target_type": "node_type",
|
|
"target_uuid": "8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_timestamp": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:10+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_log": [],
|
|
"status": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"title": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "You can do utility-first CSS with Sass"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"created": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2024-07-09T00:00:00+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"changed": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:10+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"promote": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"sticky": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"default_langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_translation_affected": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"path": [
|
|
{
|
|
"alias": "\/daily\/2024\/07\/09\/you-can-do-utility-first-css-with-sass",
|
|
"langcode": "en"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"body": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "\n <p>Yesterday, I said that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oliverdavies.uk\/daily\/2024\/07\/08\/back-to-sass-and-traditional-css\">I'm working on a Sass project with no utility or atomic styles<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<p>But, the two aren't mutually exclusive.<\/p>\n\n<p>You can do both.<\/p>\n\n<p>You can write your own utility classes, like <code>flex<\/code>, <code>font-bold<\/code> or <code>text-red<\/code> in Sass or plain CSS.<\/p>\n\n<p>You can use a framework like Tailwind CSS, but you don't need to.<\/p>\n\n<p>In some projects, with existing stylesheets and usually other frameworks, you can't add anothe full framework without having unintended consequences.<\/p>\n\n<p>Usually, if I want to introduce utility classes to an existing project, I start by writing my own that are inspired by a framework such as Tailwind CSS and maybe refactor to the framework later once the concept has been introduced and the codebase is able to work with it.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"format": "full_html",
|
|
"processed": "\n <p>Yesterday, I said that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oliverdavies.uk\/daily\/2024\/07\/08\/back-to-sass-and-traditional-css\">I'm working on a Sass project with no utility or atomic styles<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<p>But, the two aren't mutually exclusive.<\/p>\n\n<p>You can do both.<\/p>\n\n<p>You can write your own utility classes, like <code>flex<\/code>, <code>font-bold<\/code> or <code>text-red<\/code> in Sass or plain CSS.<\/p>\n\n<p>You can use a framework like Tailwind CSS, but you don't need to.<\/p>\n\n<p>In some projects, with existing stylesheets and usually other frameworks, you can't add anothe full framework without having unintended consequences.<\/p>\n\n<p>Usually, if I want to introduce utility classes to an existing project, I start by writing my own that are inspired by a framework such as Tailwind CSS and maybe refactor to the framework later once the concept has been introduced and the codebase is able to work with it.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"summary": null
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"feeds_item": [
|
|
{
|
|
"imported": "1970-01-01T00:33:45+00:00",
|
|
"guid": null,
|
|
"hash": "c6b94af805606062e0a2afbdef9c24fc",
|
|
"target_type": "feeds_feed",
|
|
"target_uuid": "90c85284-7ca8-4074-9178-97ff8384fe76"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
} |