100 lines
No EOL
3.8 KiB
JSON
100 lines
No EOL
3.8 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"uuid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "1df9b636-ff21-4c43-b093-915cf22a42b8"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "en"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"type": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_id": "daily_email",
|
|
"target_type": "node_type",
|
|
"target_uuid": "8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_timestamp": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-04-21T01:21:25+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_log": [],
|
|
"status": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"title": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "Is post-end-of-live support an anti-pattern?"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"created": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2024-10-06T00:00:00+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"changed": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-04-21T01:21:25+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"promote": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"sticky": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"default_langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_translation_affected": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"path": [
|
|
{
|
|
"alias": "\/daily\/2024\/10\/06\/is-post-end-of-live-support-an-anti-pattern",
|
|
"langcode": "en"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"body": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "\n <p>With Drupal 7's end-of-life date of the 5th of January 2025 quickly approaching, I've recently seen again a number of companies offering support for Drupal 7 after its end-of-life date.<\/p>\n\n<p>I've seen the same in corporate IT environments where they're running versions of software post their EOL date, so it's not only Drupal 7, but I wonder if this is a good thing?<\/p>\n\n<p>Is this deterring companies from upgrading if they know this is an option, or should everyone upgrade and we can move forward from Drupal 7 and other end-of-life software?<\/p>\n\n<p>According to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.drupal.org\/project\/usage\/drupal\">https:\/\/www.drupal.org\/project\/usage\/drupal<\/a>, there are still 281,000 active Drupal 7 installations.<\/p>\n\n<p>It's considerably less than before - this time last year, it was over 380,000 installations - but it's still a lot of Drupal 7 being used.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"format": "full_html",
|
|
"processed": "\n <p>With Drupal 7's end-of-life date of the 5th of January 2025 quickly approaching, I've recently seen again a number of companies offering support for Drupal 7 after its end-of-life date.<\/p>\n\n<p>I've seen the same in corporate IT environments where they're running versions of software post their EOL date, so it's not only Drupal 7, but I wonder if this is a good thing?<\/p>\n\n<p>Is this deterring companies from upgrading if they know this is an option, or should everyone upgrade and we can move forward from Drupal 7 and other end-of-life software?<\/p>\n\n<p>According to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.drupal.org\/project\/usage\/drupal\">https:\/\/www.drupal.org\/project\/usage\/drupal<\/a>, there are still 281,000 active Drupal 7 installations.<\/p>\n\n<p>It's considerably less than before - this time last year, it was over 380,000 installations - but it's still a lot of Drupal 7 being used.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"summary": null
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"feeds_item": [
|
|
{
|
|
"imported": "2025-04-21T01:21:25+00:00",
|
|
"guid": null,
|
|
"hash": "e3227fd692a43f0f5a3b4f9afed9df94",
|
|
"target_type": "feeds_feed",
|
|
"target_uuid": "90c85284-7ca8-4074-9178-97ff8384fe76"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
} |