100 lines
No EOL
6 KiB
JSON
100 lines
No EOL
6 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"uuid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "5ef48ef1-7c84-4f49-86dc-8cd3bfd3f024"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "en"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"type": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_id": "daily_email",
|
|
"target_type": "node_type",
|
|
"target_uuid": "8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_timestamp": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-04-21T01:21:52+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_log": [],
|
|
"status": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"title": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "Maintaining a module used on 35,000 Drupal websites\n"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"created": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2023-08-01T00:00:00+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"changed": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-04-21T01:21:52+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"promote": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"sticky": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"default_langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_translation_affected": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"path": [
|
|
{
|
|
"alias": "\/daily\/2023\/08\/01\/maintaining-a-module-used-on-35000-drupal-websites",
|
|
"langcode": null
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"body": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "\n <p>Note: The numbers within this post are taken from my <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oliverdavies.uk\/presentations\/tdd-test-driven-drupal\">Test-Driven Drupal talk<\/a>, in which I also talk about this.<\/p>\n\n<p>My first commit to the 7.x-1.x branch of the Override Node Options module was in March 2012. According to Drupal.org, the module was used on 9,212 websites then.<\/p>\n\n<p>As well as the 7.x-1.x branch, there's the 8.x-2.x branch which supports Drupal 9 and 10, and previously Drupal 8.<\/p>\n\n<p>The most recent statistics show the module is currently used on 34,981 websites and is consistently around 35,000.<\/p>\n\n<h2 id=\"what-does-that-mean%3F\">What does that mean?<\/h2>\n\n<p>The module is considered feature complete, but I'm not ruling out any new additions.<\/p>\n\n<p>The main thing is ensuring that any changes don't break 35,000 websites!<\/p>\n\n<p>I do this by relying on the module's automated test suite and ensuring that tests are added for any features or bugs and that the tests are passing before any new release.<\/p>\n\n<h2 id=\"this-has-worked-well\">This has worked well<\/h2>\n\n<p>A few years ago, I committed a feature request to both versions. While it didn't include additional tests, I verified the existing functionality worked after resolving a large merge conflict by ensuring the original tests passed.<\/p>\n\n<p>More recently, a colleague and I refactored the module and split each override into its own class, making adding and maintaining overrides easier.<\/p>\n\n<p>Because the tests were still passing, we knew our refactor was successful and not causing regressions.<\/p>\n\n<h2 id=\"here%27s-the-thing\">Here's the thing<\/h2>\n\n<p>Having automated tests and ensuring they're always passing has allowed me to add features and refactor code that I wouldn't have done or had the confidence to do otherwise.<\/p>\n\n<p>It's great to have a popular module, but on the other hand, I don't want to break 35,000 websites which makes the tests invaluable.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"format": "full_html",
|
|
"processed": "\n <p>Note: The numbers within this post are taken from my <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oliverdavies.uk\/presentations\/tdd-test-driven-drupal\">Test-Driven Drupal talk<\/a>, in which I also talk about this.<\/p>\n\n<p>My first commit to the 7.x-1.x branch of the Override Node Options module was in March 2012. According to Drupal.org, the module was used on 9,212 websites then.<\/p>\n\n<p>As well as the 7.x-1.x branch, there's the 8.x-2.x branch which supports Drupal 9 and 10, and previously Drupal 8.<\/p>\n\n<p>The most recent statistics show the module is currently used on 34,981 websites and is consistently around 35,000.<\/p>\n\n<h2 id=\"what-does-that-mean%3F\">What does that mean?<\/h2>\n\n<p>The module is considered feature complete, but I'm not ruling out any new additions.<\/p>\n\n<p>The main thing is ensuring that any changes don't break 35,000 websites!<\/p>\n\n<p>I do this by relying on the module's automated test suite and ensuring that tests are added for any features or bugs and that the tests are passing before any new release.<\/p>\n\n<h2 id=\"this-has-worked-well\">This has worked well<\/h2>\n\n<p>A few years ago, I committed a feature request to both versions. While it didn't include additional tests, I verified the existing functionality worked after resolving a large merge conflict by ensuring the original tests passed.<\/p>\n\n<p>More recently, a colleague and I refactored the module and split each override into its own class, making adding and maintaining overrides easier.<\/p>\n\n<p>Because the tests were still passing, we knew our refactor was successful and not causing regressions.<\/p>\n\n<h2 id=\"here%27s-the-thing\">Here's the thing<\/h2>\n\n<p>Having automated tests and ensuring they're always passing has allowed me to add features and refactor code that I wouldn't have done or had the confidence to do otherwise.<\/p>\n\n<p>It's great to have a popular module, but on the other hand, I don't want to break 35,000 websites which makes the tests invaluable.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"summary": null
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"feeds_item": [
|
|
{
|
|
"imported": "2025-04-21T01:21:52+00:00",
|
|
"guid": null,
|
|
"hash": "ae450dbfadd5cdf2b2b209019173a073",
|
|
"target_type": "feeds_feed",
|
|
"target_uuid": "90c85284-7ca8-4074-9178-97ff8384fe76"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
} |