oliverdavies.uk/content/node.f98589c7-10e8-4903-b801-f2a42135b190.yml

81 lines
4 KiB
YAML

uuid:
- value: f98589c7-10e8-4903-b801-f2a42135b190
langcode:
- value: en
type:
- target_id: daily_email
target_type: node_type
target_uuid: 8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7
revision_timestamp:
- value: '2025-05-11T09:00:50+00:00'
revision_uid:
- target_type: user
target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849
revision_log: { }
status:
- value: true
uid:
- target_type: user
target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849
title:
- value: |
How and why I started using PostCSS
created:
- value: '2022-12-09T00:00:00+00:00'
changed:
- value: '2025-05-11T09:00:50+00:00'
promote:
- value: false
sticky:
- value: false
default_langcode:
- value: true
revision_translation_affected:
- value: true
path:
- alias: /daily/2022/12/09/how-and-why-i-started-using-postcss
langcode: en
body:
- value: |
<p>I assume that, like many other Developers, when I started learning front-end development, I wrote normal, plain CSS and later discovered and adopted pre-processors like Less and Sass that added features such as variables and nesting to my stylesheets.</p>
<p>This was the case when I first saw what became Tailwind CSS, which were some stylesheets written in Less and ported manually between projects.</p>
<p>I remember watching one of those streams, and a fellow viewer suggested PostCSS, which Tailwind CSS would later be written in.</p>
<p>PostCSS, a CSS post-processor rather than a pre-processor, has become my preferred way of writing CSS because of Tailwind.</p>
<p>When I started using Tailwind in my projects, I was layering it on top of another CSS framework or styles that were written using Less or Sass, so I needed to pre-process them into CSS first and then run PostCSS - essentially running two build steps and adding to the build time.</p>
<p>I moved to use PostCSS by default - removing one of the build steps.</p>
<p>What I liked about it, as well as the quicker build times, was that I could start with plain CSS and add the extra features I needed. I didn't use all of Sass and Less' features, and now, if I needed nesting or real-time imports, I could add it via a PostCSS plugin or write my own.</p>
<p>It's also quick and easy to use, using the PostCSS CLI tool and without more complex tools like Webpack.</p>
<p>If you haven't tried PostCSS, I recommend taking a look.</p>
format: full_html
processed: |
<p>I assume that, like many other Developers, when I started learning front-end development, I wrote normal, plain CSS and later discovered and adopted pre-processors like Less and Sass that added features such as variables and nesting to my stylesheets.</p>
<p>This was the case when I first saw what became Tailwind CSS, which were some stylesheets written in Less and ported manually between projects.</p>
<p>I remember watching one of those streams, and a fellow viewer suggested PostCSS, which Tailwind CSS would later be written in.</p>
<p>PostCSS, a CSS post-processor rather than a pre-processor, has become my preferred way of writing CSS because of Tailwind.</p>
<p>When I started using Tailwind in my projects, I was layering it on top of another CSS framework or styles that were written using Less or Sass, so I needed to pre-process them into CSS first and then run PostCSS - essentially running two build steps and adding to the build time.</p>
<p>I moved to use PostCSS by default - removing one of the build steps.</p>
<p>What I liked about it, as well as the quicker build times, was that I could start with plain CSS and add the extra features I needed. I didn't use all of Sass and Less' features, and now, if I needed nesting or real-time imports, I could add it via a PostCSS plugin or write my own.</p>
<p>It's also quick and easy to use, using the PostCSS CLI tool and without more complex tools like Webpack.</p>
<p>If you haven't tried PostCSS, I recommend taking a look.</p>
summary: null
field_daily_email_cta: { }