oliverdavies.uk/content/node.db312e00-7a9d-492d-a6db-7298848e06b2.yml

84 lines
4.1 KiB
YAML

uuid:
- value: db312e00-7a9d-492d-a6db-7298848e06b2
langcode:
- value: en
type:
- target_id: daily_email
target_type: node_type
target_uuid: 8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7
revision_timestamp:
- value: '2025-05-11T09:00:22+00:00'
revision_uid:
- target_type: user
target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849
revision_log: { }
status:
- value: true
uid:
- target_type: user
target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849
title:
- value: 'Defining Ubiquitous language'
created:
- value: '2024-01-24T00:00:00+00:00'
changed:
- value: '2025-05-11T09:00:22+00:00'
promote:
- value: false
sticky:
- value: false
default_langcode:
- value: true
revision_translation_affected:
- value: true
path:
- alias: /daily/2024/01/24/defining-ubiquitous-language
langcode: en
body:
- value: |
<p>A key takeaway from Rob Allen's Domain-Driven Design talk was defining ubiquitous language and avoiding the phrase "That's not what I meant".</p>
<p>Even a simple table or glossary that lists business and domain-specific terms and their agreed meaning is very helpful to ensure everyone in the discussion is on the same page and means the same thing.</p>
<p>Rob's example was using the words "policy" and "risk" when dealing with insurance clients.</p>
<p>A common issue I've seen is where people are referred to as customers by the business and users within the software.</p>
<p>Ideally, these should be consistent, and the code should match the business terminology.</p>
<p>This can be complicated further by different areas of the business, such as a marketing team that may refer to people as subscribers.</p>
<p>Without the ubiquitous language being defined, the requirements are more likely to be misunderstood and the wrong solution delivered, resulting in "that's not what I meant.".</p>
<p>This then means the work needs to be re-done and delayed, which can be expensive and time-consuming.</p>
<p>Another approach is to work in small batches, which is something I've written about before, and getting feedback from customers as early and often as possible so, if there is a misunderstanding, the minimum amount of time has been spent before it's realised and rectified.</p>
<p>Rob, of course, covered a lot more about DDD in his talk, and I'm looking forward to re-watching it once the video from the meetup is released.</p>
format: full_html
processed: |
<p>A key takeaway from Rob Allen's Domain-Driven Design talk was defining ubiquitous language and avoiding the phrase "That's not what I meant".</p>
<p>Even a simple table or glossary that lists business and domain-specific terms and their agreed meaning is very helpful to ensure everyone in the discussion is on the same page and means the same thing.</p>
<p>Rob's example was using the words "policy" and "risk" when dealing with insurance clients.</p>
<p>A common issue I've seen is where people are referred to as customers by the business and users within the software.</p>
<p>Ideally, these should be consistent, and the code should match the business terminology.</p>
<p>This can be complicated further by different areas of the business, such as a marketing team that may refer to people as subscribers.</p>
<p>Without the ubiquitous language being defined, the requirements are more likely to be misunderstood and the wrong solution delivered, resulting in "that's not what I meant.".</p>
<p>This then means the work needs to be re-done and delayed, which can be expensive and time-consuming.</p>
<p>Another approach is to work in small batches, which is something I've written about before, and getting feedback from customers as early and often as possible so, if there is a misunderstanding, the minimum amount of time has been spent before it's realised and rectified.</p>
<p>Rob, of course, covered a lot more about DDD in his talk, and I'm looking forward to re-watching it once the video from the meetup is released.</p>
summary: null
field_daily_email_cta: { }