oliverdavies.uk/content/node.53d1af45-bb51-4e4a-a2b9-b732bc9dc8ea.yml

88 lines
4 KiB
YAML

uuid:
- value: 53d1af45-bb51-4e4a-a2b9-b732bc9dc8ea
langcode:
- value: en
type:
- target_id: daily_email
target_type: node_type
target_uuid: 8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7
revision_timestamp:
- value: '2025-05-11T09:00:10+00:00'
revision_uid:
- target_type: user
target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849
revision_log: { }
status:
- value: true
uid:
- target_type: user
target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849
title:
- value: 'Dead or done'
created:
- value: '2024-06-14T00:00:00+00:00'
changed:
- value: '2025-05-11T09:00:10+00:00'
promote:
- value: false
sticky:
- value: false
default_langcode:
- value: true
revision_translation_affected:
- value: true
path:
- alias: /daily/2024/06/14/dead-or-done
langcode: en
body:
- value: |
<p>Yesterday, I wrote about <a href="/daily/2024/06/13/vetting-third-party-open-source-software">some things I look for when evaluating open-source projects</a>.</p>
<p>One thing I said was "When was the most recent commit and release?".</p>
<p>If a project hasn't had many recent commits, it could be outdated or no longer supported.</p>
<p>Alternatively, it could be considered feature complete and not getting new features, and only getting bug fixes and maintenance updates.</p>
<p>I see this a lot with Vim plugins that were written several years ago and are now minimally maintained and updated, but getting no new features.</p>
<p>This happens in the Drupal space, too, when people wrote a module for a project which they have since completed, or no longer work with that client or for that company.</p>
<p>If there are at least commits for security compatibility, such as new versions of PHP or node, that's a sign the project is in a maintenance phase.</p>
<p>If there are no recent commits, the project could be dead and I'd carefully consider if you want to add or use it.</p>
<p>Something that could help is if maintainers are explicit about what state their project is in.</p>
<p>Add a note to the README.md or CONTRIBUTING.md file saying if the project is feature complete or what the maintenance state is.</p>
<p>If the project is no longer maintained, you can also document it and potentially archive the repository too to show that it will no longer be updated and to avoid confusion.</p>
format: full_html
processed: |
<p>Yesterday, I wrote about <a href="http://default/daily/2024/06/13/vetting-third-party-open-source-software">some things I look for when evaluating open-source projects</a>.</p>
<p>One thing I said was "When was the most recent commit and release?".</p>
<p>If a project hasn't had many recent commits, it could be outdated or no longer supported.</p>
<p>Alternatively, it could be considered feature complete and not getting new features, and only getting bug fixes and maintenance updates.</p>
<p>I see this a lot with Vim plugins that were written several years ago and are now minimally maintained and updated, but getting no new features.</p>
<p>This happens in the Drupal space, too, when people wrote a module for a project which they have since completed, or no longer work with that client or for that company.</p>
<p>If there are at least commits for security compatibility, such as new versions of PHP or node, that's a sign the project is in a maintenance phase.</p>
<p>If there are no recent commits, the project could be dead and I'd carefully consider if you want to add or use it.</p>
<p>Something that could help is if maintainers are explicit about what state their project is in.</p>
<p>Add a note to the README.md or CONTRIBUTING.md file saying if the project is feature complete or what the maintenance state is.</p>
<p>If the project is no longer maintained, you can also document it and potentially archive the repository too to show that it will no longer be updated and to avoid confusion.</p>
summary: null
field_daily_email_cta: { }