oliverdavies.uk/content/node.2258201f-7beb-4b2a-8a52-ea31c09de73f.yml

101 lines
4.1 KiB
YAML

uuid:
- value: 2258201f-7beb-4b2a-8a52-ea31c09de73f
langcode:
- value: en
type:
- target_id: daily_email
target_type: node_type
target_uuid: 8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7
revision_timestamp:
- value: '2025-05-11T09:00:44+00:00'
revision_uid:
- target_type: user
target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849
revision_log: { }
status:
- value: true
uid:
- target_type: user
target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849
title:
- value: |
Camel-case or snake-case for Drupal code?
created:
- value: '2023-04-19T00:00:00+00:00'
changed:
- value: '2025-05-11T09:00:44+00:00'
promote:
- value: false
sticky:
- value: false
default_langcode:
- value: true
revision_translation_affected:
- value: true
path:
- alias: /daily/2023/04/19/camel-case-or-snake-case-for-drupal-code
langcode: en
body:
- value: |
<p>For some time, <a href="https://www.drupal.org/docs/develop/standards/php/php-coding-standards#s-functions-and-variables">Drupal's PHP coding standards</a> allows for writing variables in either snake-case (e.g. <code>$my_variable</code>) or lower camel-case (<code>e.g. $myVariable</code>).</p>
<p>It originally only allowed for snake-case variable names but once it accepted both, I switched to camel-case as my default.</p>
<p>Why? I didn't like the inconsistency of using one approach for variable names and one for method and property names in PHP classes (which were always camel-case).</p>
<p>I'd have had code like this with a mixture of both:</p>
<pre><code class="language-php">class MyClass {
private EntityTypeManagerInterface $entityTypeManager;
public function __construct(EntityTypeManagerInterface $entity_type_manager) {
$this-&gt;entityTypeManager = $entity_type_manager;
}
}
</code></pre>
<p>Or even more simply:</p>
<pre><code class="language-php">$entity_type_manager = \Drupal::entityTypeManager();
</code></pre>
<p>I prefer not to have to consistently think about which to use and, if possible, like to use standard approaches in different codebases whether I'm working on a Drupal project, a Symfony project, or a PHP library.</p>
<p>Plus, I get to use new PHP features like <a href="/daily/2023/04/12/cleaner-php-code-with-promoted-constructor-properties">promoted constructor properties</a> if everything is named in the same format.</p>
format: full_html
processed: |
<p>For some time, <a href="https://www.drupal.org/docs/develop/standards/php/php-coding-standards#s-functions-and-variables">Drupal's PHP coding standards</a> allows for writing variables in either snake-case (e.g. <code>$my_variable</code>) or lower camel-case (<code>e.g. $myVariable</code>).</p>
<p>It originally only allowed for snake-case variable names but once it accepted both, I switched to camel-case as my default.</p>
<p>Why? I didn't like the inconsistency of using one approach for variable names and one for method and property names in PHP classes (which were always camel-case).</p>
<p>I'd have had code like this with a mixture of both:</p>
<pre><code class="language-php">class MyClass {
private EntityTypeManagerInterface $entityTypeManager;
public function __construct(EntityTypeManagerInterface $entity_type_manager) {
$this-&gt;entityTypeManager = $entity_type_manager;
}
}
</code></pre>
<p>Or even more simply:</p>
<pre><code class="language-php">$entity_type_manager = \Drupal::entityTypeManager();
</code></pre>
<p>I prefer not to have to consistently think about which to use and, if possible, like to use standard approaches in different codebases whether I'm working on a Drupal project, a Symfony project, or a PHP library.</p>
<p>Plus, I get to use new PHP features like <a href="http://default/daily/2023/04/12/cleaner-php-code-with-promoted-constructor-properties">promoted constructor properties</a> if everything is named in the same format.</p>
summary: null
field_daily_email_cta: { }