Oliver Davies
7a7dc297ca
Now the abs_to_rel module is enabled, links can be made relative so they work on the current environment.
100 lines
No EOL
4 KiB
JSON
100 lines
No EOL
4 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"uuid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "a2dbc5b2-ae56-4583-bc9f-ec0f70601eae"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "en"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"type": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_id": "daily_email",
|
|
"target_type": "node_type",
|
|
"target_uuid": "8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_timestamp": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:20+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_log": [],
|
|
"status": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"title": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": ".gitignore or .gitallow"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"created": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2024-02-05T00:00:00+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"changed": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:20+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"promote": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"sticky": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"default_langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_translation_affected": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"path": [
|
|
{
|
|
"alias": "\/daily\/2024\/02\/05\/gitignore-or-gitallow",
|
|
"langcode": "en"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"body": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "\n <p>Following last week's email on <a href=\"/daily\/2024\/01\/27\/gitignore-inclusive-or-exclusive\">different ways to write .gitignore files<\/a>, friend of the list, Daniel Harper, sent me this reply (shared with permission):<\/p>\n\n<blockquote>\n <p>I had a debate once about this topic and we settled on ignore as the filename explicitly describes what it should be doing ie. It's not .gitallow \ud83d\ude06<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n<p>This is a good point.<\/p>\n\n<p>What do people expect to see in a <code>.gitignore<\/code> file?<\/p>\n\n<p>A list of directories and files to be ignored or allowed?<\/p>\n\n<p>Based on the filename, it should be the former.<\/p>\n\n<p>This would be clearer for people when they first open the file.<\/p>\n\n<p>However, if you decide to use the allow approach instead, document it in an <a href=\"/daily\/2022\/09\/23\/adrs-technical-design-documents\">ADR or design document<\/a> and why you decided to do it that way and provide context for people working on the codebase in the future.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"format": "full_html",
|
|
"processed": "\n <p>Following last week's email on <a href=\"/daily\/2024\/01\/27\/gitignore-inclusive-or-exclusive\">different ways to write .gitignore files<\/a>, friend of the list, Daniel Harper, sent me this reply (shared with permission):<\/p>\n\n<blockquote>\n <p>I had a debate once about this topic and we settled on ignore as the filename explicitly describes what it should be doing ie. It's not .gitallow \ud83d\ude06<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n<p>This is a good point.<\/p>\n\n<p>What do people expect to see in a <code>.gitignore<\/code> file?<\/p>\n\n<p>A list of directories and files to be ignored or allowed?<\/p>\n\n<p>Based on the filename, it should be the former.<\/p>\n\n<p>This would be clearer for people when they first open the file.<\/p>\n\n<p>However, if you decide to use the allow approach instead, document it in an <a href=\"/daily\/2022\/09\/23\/adrs-technical-design-documents\">ADR or design document<\/a> and why you decided to do it that way and provide context for people working on the codebase in the future.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"summary": null
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"feeds_item": [
|
|
{
|
|
"imported": "1970-01-01T00:33:45+00:00",
|
|
"guid": null,
|
|
"hash": "8c32951c32d678ca2fe6bac26a108dcb",
|
|
"target_type": "feeds_feed",
|
|
"target_uuid": "90c85284-7ca8-4074-9178-97ff8384fe76"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
} |