Oliver Davies
7a7dc297ca
Now the abs_to_rel module is enabled, links can be made relative so they work on the current environment.
100 lines
No EOL
3.8 KiB
JSON
100 lines
No EOL
3.8 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"uuid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "3cb7e223-af31-471e-acef-d3d069852841"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "en"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"type": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_id": "daily_email",
|
|
"target_type": "node_type",
|
|
"target_uuid": "8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_timestamp": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:12+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_log": [],
|
|
"status": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"title": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "Drupal is older than..."
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"created": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2024-06-08T00:00:00+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"changed": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:12+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"promote": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"sticky": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"default_langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_translation_affected": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"path": [
|
|
{
|
|
"alias": "\/daily\/2024\/06\/08\/drupal-is-older-than",
|
|
"langcode": "en"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"body": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "\n <p>Whilst writing <a href=\"/daily\/2024\/06\/07\/not-invented-here\">yesterday's email<\/a> about \"not invented here\", I started thinking about how Drupal's timeline (which was created 23 years ago) compares to some of the other similar or related projects.<\/p>\n\n<p>Here's a list of project release dates from ChatGPT, which seem correct to me at a glance:<\/p>\n\n<ul>\n<li>Drupal: January 15, 2001.<\/li>\n<li>Git: April 7, 2005.<\/li>\n<li>Symfony 1: October 22, 2005.<\/li>\n<li>GitHub and Bitbucket: 2008.<\/li>\n<li>GitLab: October 2011.<\/li>\n<li>Laravel: June 9, 2011.<\/li>\n<li>Drupal 7: January 5, 2011.<\/li>\n<li>Symfony 2: July 28, 2011.<\/li>\n<li>Composer: March 1, 2012.<\/li>\n<li>Drupal 8: November 19, 2015.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p>Looking at this list, when speaking about \"not invented here\", a lot of what Drupal would come to use and depend on just didn't exist in its early years.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"format": "full_html",
|
|
"processed": "\n <p>Whilst writing <a href=\"/daily\/2024\/06\/07\/not-invented-here\">yesterday's email<\/a> about \"not invented here\", I started thinking about how Drupal's timeline (which was created 23 years ago) compares to some of the other similar or related projects.<\/p>\n\n<p>Here's a list of project release dates from ChatGPT, which seem correct to me at a glance:<\/p>\n\n<ul>\n<li>Drupal: January 15, 2001.<\/li>\n<li>Git: April 7, 2005.<\/li>\n<li>Symfony 1: October 22, 2005.<\/li>\n<li>GitHub and Bitbucket: 2008.<\/li>\n<li>GitLab: October 2011.<\/li>\n<li>Laravel: June 9, 2011.<\/li>\n<li>Drupal 7: January 5, 2011.<\/li>\n<li>Symfony 2: July 28, 2011.<\/li>\n<li>Composer: March 1, 2012.<\/li>\n<li>Drupal 8: November 19, 2015.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p>Looking at this list, when speaking about \"not invented here\", a lot of what Drupal would come to use and depend on just didn't exist in its early years.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"summary": null
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"feeds_item": [
|
|
{
|
|
"imported": "1970-01-01T00:33:45+00:00",
|
|
"guid": null,
|
|
"hash": "26c761c39af062f8236f0e3f605571b4",
|
|
"target_type": "feeds_feed",
|
|
"target_uuid": "90c85284-7ca8-4074-9178-97ff8384fe76"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
} |