91 lines
No EOL
3.2 KiB
JSON
91 lines
No EOL
3.2 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"uuid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "05232b81-d945-4112-99bf-d1adb2552428"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "en"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"type": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_id": "daily_email",
|
|
"target_type": "node_type",
|
|
"target_uuid": "8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_timestamp": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:12+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_log": [],
|
|
"status": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"title": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "Why is everyone moving to SQLite?"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"created": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2024-05-28T00:00:00+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"changed": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:12+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"promote": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"sticky": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"default_langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_translation_affected": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"path": [
|
|
{
|
|
"alias": "\/daily\/2024\/05\/28\/why-is-everyone-moving-to-sqlite",
|
|
"langcode": "en"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"body": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "\n <p>I've noticed a lot of Developers recently adopting SQLite for their database and I wonder why this is.<\/p>\n\n<p>Laravel changed their default database to SQLite for local development.<\/p>\n\n<p>It simplifies the development environment as there's no need for a separate database like MySQL or MariaDB but, if you'll be using one of those in production, won't that cause more issues when you migrate your local application?<\/p>\n\n<p>Drupal supports using SQLite, but, other than for <a href=\"\/atdc\">my automated testing course<\/a>, or when running automated tests, I've always used a MySQL or MariaDB database.<\/p>\n\n<p>Maybe this is something to keep an eye on and potentially use more for some scenarios in the future.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"format": "full_html",
|
|
"processed": "\n <p>I've noticed a lot of Developers recently adopting SQLite for their database and I wonder why this is.<\/p>\n\n<p>Laravel changed their default database to SQLite for local development.<\/p>\n\n<p>It simplifies the development environment as there's no need for a separate database like MySQL or MariaDB but, if you'll be using one of those in production, won't that cause more issues when you migrate your local application?<\/p>\n\n<p>Drupal supports using SQLite, but, other than for <a href=\"http:\/\/default\/atdc\">my automated testing course<\/a>, or when running automated tests, I've always used a MySQL or MariaDB database.<\/p>\n\n<p>Maybe this is something to keep an eye on and potentially use more for some scenarios in the future.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"summary": null
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
} |