91 lines
No EOL
5 KiB
JSON
91 lines
No EOL
5 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"uuid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "62d91e86-a22e-4ef9-851d-bd2b02c411a9"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "en"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"type": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_id": "daily_email",
|
|
"target_type": "node_type",
|
|
"target_uuid": "8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_timestamp": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:53+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_log": [],
|
|
"status": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"title": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "Are sprints incompatible with Continuous Deployment?\n"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"created": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2022-11-08T00:00:00+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"changed": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:53+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"promote": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"sticky": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"default_langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_translation_affected": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"path": [
|
|
{
|
|
"alias": "\/daily\/2022\/11\/08\/are-sprints-incompatible-with-continuous-deployment",
|
|
"langcode": "en"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"body": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "\n <p>It's been common for me whilst working on software projects to have work organised into sprints or cycles - a period, usually between 1 and 3 weeks, where the team is working on stories and tasks for that project.<\/p>\n\n<p>In my experience, those changes are usually released at the end of that cycle. But it seems that's not always the case; see <a href=\"https:\/\/scrumdictionary.com\/term\/release-sprint\">release sprints<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n<blockquote>\n <p>A specialised sprint whose purpose is to release deliverable results; it contains stories specific to release activities and finishing undone work. A release sprint usually contains no additional development.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n<p>If we worked in two-week cycles and released at the end of each one, it would be at least two weeks before a change could be deployed to production. But what if we wanted to follow continuous deployment and release more frequently? Maybe daily or hourly?<\/p>\n\n<p>Instead of waiting for a release sprint, if we released multiple times within a single sprint, how would this fit into or affect the process?<\/p>\n\n<p>Does the release cycle need to be tightly coupled to the sprint cycle or can they be separate and independent of each other?<\/p>\n\n<p>I've worked on projects - including a current one - where I've done multiple releases in a sprint, so of course, it can be done from a technical perspective, but how do we get the best from both processes - whether they work together or separately?<\/p>\n\n<p>This is something that I'm going to continue to experiment with, iterate on, and learn more about going forward.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"format": "full_html",
|
|
"processed": "\n <p>It's been common for me whilst working on software projects to have work organised into sprints or cycles - a period, usually between 1 and 3 weeks, where the team is working on stories and tasks for that project.<\/p>\n\n<p>In my experience, those changes are usually released at the end of that cycle. But it seems that's not always the case; see <a href=\"https:\/\/scrumdictionary.com\/term\/release-sprint\">release sprints<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n<blockquote>\n <p>A specialised sprint whose purpose is to release deliverable results; it contains stories specific to release activities and finishing undone work. A release sprint usually contains no additional development.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n<p>If we worked in two-week cycles and released at the end of each one, it would be at least two weeks before a change could be deployed to production. But what if we wanted to follow continuous deployment and release more frequently? Maybe daily or hourly?<\/p>\n\n<p>Instead of waiting for a release sprint, if we released multiple times within a single sprint, how would this fit into or affect the process?<\/p>\n\n<p>Does the release cycle need to be tightly coupled to the sprint cycle or can they be separate and independent of each other?<\/p>\n\n<p>I've worked on projects - including a current one - where I've done multiple releases in a sprint, so of course, it can be done from a technical perspective, but how do we get the best from both processes - whether they work together or separately?<\/p>\n\n<p>This is something that I'm going to continue to experiment with, iterate on, and learn more about going forward.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"summary": null
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
} |