Oliver Davies
7a7dc297ca
Now the abs_to_rel module is enabled, links can be made relative so they work on the current environment.
100 lines
No EOL
3.8 KiB
JSON
100 lines
No EOL
3.8 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"uuid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2959438c-8c12-49c7-84a2-d9ea9bf338e6"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "en"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"type": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_id": "daily_email",
|
|
"target_type": "node_type",
|
|
"target_uuid": "8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_timestamp": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:01+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_log": [],
|
|
"status": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"uid": [
|
|
{
|
|
"target_type": "user",
|
|
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"title": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "Tidy then push"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"created": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-02-11T00:00:00+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"changed": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:01+00:00"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"promote": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"sticky": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"default_langcode": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"revision_translation_affected": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": true
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"path": [
|
|
{
|
|
"alias": "\/daily\/2025\/02\/11\/tidy",
|
|
"langcode": "en"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"body": [
|
|
{
|
|
"value": "\n <p>As I said <a href=\"/daily\/2025\/02\/10\/refactoring\">in yesterday's email<\/a>, sometimes you change your mind whilst working on something.<\/p>\n\n<p>Maybe you change your approach and have a commit that supersedes an earlier one, fix a typo, or find a bug and need to revert a commit.<\/p>\n\n<p>If you're pushing your changes to a branch for review, I suggest using <code>git rebase<\/code> to clean up your commits.<\/p>\n\n<p>You can squash the typo fix into the commit that introduced the typo, or remove the original implementation that you later moved away from.<\/p>\n\n<p>Whilst there is an option to squash all the commits when merging, I don't like it and prefer people to tidy their commits before pushing.<\/p>\n\n<p>This means the commits are easier to review and you can keep the original commit history and all the context within the messages instead of a generic <code>Merge commit..<\/code> message.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"format": "full_html",
|
|
"processed": "\n <p>As I said <a href=\"/daily\/2025\/02\/10\/refactoring\">in yesterday's email<\/a>, sometimes you change your mind whilst working on something.<\/p>\n\n<p>Maybe you change your approach and have a commit that supersedes an earlier one, fix a typo, or find a bug and need to revert a commit.<\/p>\n\n<p>If you're pushing your changes to a branch for review, I suggest using <code>git rebase<\/code> to clean up your commits.<\/p>\n\n<p>You can squash the typo fix into the commit that introduced the typo, or remove the original implementation that you later moved away from.<\/p>\n\n<p>Whilst there is an option to squash all the commits when merging, I don't like it and prefer people to tidy their commits before pushing.<\/p>\n\n<p>This means the commits are easier to review and you can keep the original commit history and all the context within the messages instead of a generic <code>Merge commit..<\/code> message.<\/p>\n\n ",
|
|
"summary": null
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"feeds_item": [
|
|
{
|
|
"imported": "1970-01-01T00:33:45+00:00",
|
|
"guid": null,
|
|
"hash": "9244db868e27ad48ece974399c743c82",
|
|
"target_type": "feeds_feed",
|
|
"target_uuid": "90c85284-7ca8-4074-9178-97ff8384fe76"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
} |