uuid: - value: fa7b57ee-9af5-49ce-9522-66d54642e219 langcode: - value: en type: - target_id: daily_email target_type: node_type target_uuid: 8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7 revision_timestamp: - value: '2025-05-11T09:00:06+00:00' revision_uid: - target_type: user target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849 revision_log: { } status: - value: true uid: - target_type: user target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849 title: - value: "Technical debt isn't always bad" created: - value: '2024-10-02T00:00:00+00:00' changed: - value: '2025-05-11T09:00:06+00:00' promote: - value: false sticky: - value: false default_langcode: - value: true revision_translation_affected: - value: true path: - alias: /daily/2024/10/02/technical-debt-isn-t-always-bad langcode: en body: - value: |
Technical debt is usually referred to negatively, but technical debt isn't always bad.
The key thing is to know when and why you're taking on technical debt and when it will be addressed.
If you have a goal or deadline to meet, you may decide to take on technical debt to release a feature sooner or a simpler version is released now and a more complex version will come later.
I've done this on multi-site Drupal projects before, where I've hard-coded a background image URL as part of a minimum-viable version and made it changeable only when it needed to be - i.e. when the second website was introduced.
For the initial version, that approach was good enough and meant we could move forward.
The client and I decided to take on this technical debit in advance so we could release it sooner, and we knew when and how we were going to address it and pay it back.
This was a good situation, not a bad one.
format: full_html processed: |Technical debt is usually referred to negatively, but technical debt isn't always bad.
The key thing is to know when and why you're taking on technical debt and when it will be addressed.
If you have a goal or deadline to meet, you may decide to take on technical debt to release a feature sooner or a simpler version is released now and a more complex version will come later.
I've done this on multi-site Drupal projects before, where I've hard-coded a background image URL as part of a minimum-viable version and made it changeable only when it needed to be - i.e. when the second website was introduced.
For the initial version, that approach was good enough and meant we could move forward.
The client and I decided to take on this technical debit in advance so we could release it sooner, and we knew when and how we were going to address it and pay it back.
This was a good situation, not a bad one.
summary: null field_daily_email_cta: { }