uuid: - value: 9533c89f-d5dd-4959-ba2c-66be5df70f60 langcode: - value: en type: - target_id: daily_email target_type: node_type target_uuid: 8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7 revision_timestamp: - value: '2025-05-11T09:00:22+00:00' revision_uid: - target_type: user target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849 revision_log: { } status: - value: true uid: - target_type: user target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849 title: - value: 'Daily or quarterly?' created: - value: '2024-01-16T00:00:00+00:00' changed: - value: '2025-05-11T09:00:22+00:00' promote: - value: false sticky: - value: false default_langcode: - value: true revision_translation_affected: - value: true path: - alias: /daily/2024/01/16/daily-or-quarterly langcode: en body: - value: |
Imagine this scenario.
You have two options on how frequently you can deploy code changes to your application.
Option 1: Every day.
Option 2: Once a quarter.
No more, no less.
I'd choose daily.
I much prefer to deploy changes as often as possible rather than waiting.
I'm much more confident when releasing small changes - even if it's a small refactor, such as changing a variable name or extracting a small helper method.
It might even seem too small to release.
But the smaller the release is, the easier it is to find and fix any issues, and knowing that the next release would only be the following day makes it easier to fix forward instead of rolling back a large release with months of changes.
Whilst it may seem counterintuitive initially, it's much less risky to release small changes often compared to large changes infrequently.
Which option would you choose?
format: full_html processed: |Imagine this scenario.
You have two options on how frequently you can deploy code changes to your application.
Option 1: Every day.
Option 2: Once a quarter.
No more, no less.
I'd choose daily.
I much prefer to deploy changes as often as possible rather than waiting.
I'm much more confident when releasing small changes - even if it's a small refactor, such as changing a variable name or extracting a small helper method.
It might even seem too small to release.
But the smaller the release is, the easier it is to find and fix any issues, and knowing that the next release would only be the following day makes it easier to fix forward instead of rolling back a large release with months of changes.
Whilst it may seem counterintuitive initially, it's much less risky to release small changes often compared to large changes infrequently.
Which option would you choose?
summary: null field_daily_email_cta: { }