{
    "uuid": [
        {
            "value": "59cd5b64-d1c8-4249-ab41-2106e25df543"
        }
    ],
    "langcode": [
        {
            "value": "en"
        }
    ],
    "type": [
        {
            "target_id": "daily_email",
            "target_type": "node_type",
            "target_uuid": "8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7"
        }
    ],
    "revision_timestamp": [
        {
            "value": "2025-05-11T09:00:28+00:00"
        }
    ],
    "revision_uid": [
        {
            "target_type": "user",
            "target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
        }
    ],
    "revision_log": [],
    "status": [
        {
            "value": true
        }
    ],
    "uid": [
        {
            "target_type": "user",
            "target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
        }
    ],
    "title": [
        {
            "value": "Is code coverage an objective or guideline?\n"
        }
    ],
    "created": [
        {
            "value": "2023-11-02T00:00:00+00:00"
        }
    ],
    "changed": [
        {
            "value": "2025-05-11T09:00:28+00:00"
        }
    ],
    "promote": [
        {
            "value": false
        }
    ],
    "sticky": [
        {
            "value": false
        }
    ],
    "default_langcode": [
        {
            "value": true
        }
    ],
    "revision_translation_affected": [
        {
            "value": true
        }
    ],
    "path": [
        {
            "alias": "\/daily\/2023\/11\/02\/is-code-coverage-an-objective-or-guideline",
            "langcode": "en"
        }
    ],
    "body": [
        {
            "value": "\n          <p>Many development teams and projects use code coverage - e.g. how many lines of code are covered by automated tests - as an objective, and saying it must be 100% or another percentage.<\/p>\n\n<p>But is this an effective metric?<\/p>\n\n<p>In the same way as deleting failing tests to fix a pipeline, a code coverage amount can be faked.<\/p>\n\n<p>With this in mind, what if, instead of setting an objective such as 100% code coverage, you used it as a guideline?<\/p>\n\n<p>If you're working on a legacy project, what if you set a minimum code coverage amount as a guideline to ensure any new code has tests by not dropping under that level?<\/p>\n\n<p>Would that be better than saying every line of code needs to be covered?<\/p>\n\n<p>Code coverage is something I'm thinking of using more, so I want to know what you think.<\/p>\n\n        ",
            "format": "full_html",
            "processed": "\n          <p>Many development teams and projects use code coverage - e.g. how many lines of code are covered by automated tests - as an objective, and saying it must be 100% or another percentage.<\/p>\n\n<p>But is this an effective metric?<\/p>\n\n<p>In the same way as deleting failing tests to fix a pipeline, a code coverage amount can be faked.<\/p>\n\n<p>With this in mind, what if, instead of setting an objective such as 100% code coverage, you used it as a guideline?<\/p>\n\n<p>If you're working on a legacy project, what if you set a minimum code coverage amount as a guideline to ensure any new code has tests by not dropping under that level?<\/p>\n\n<p>Would that be better than saying every line of code needs to be covered?<\/p>\n\n<p>Code coverage is something I'm thinking of using more, so I want to know what you think.<\/p>\n\n        ",
            "summary": null
        }
    ],
    "feeds_item": [
        {
            "imported": "1970-01-01T00:33:45+00:00",
            "guid": null,
            "hash": "37779b8be562eca580a1d3eb2ead9f83",
            "target_type": "feeds_feed",
            "target_uuid": "90c85284-7ca8-4074-9178-97ff8384fe76"
        }
    ]
}