uuid: - value: 162509c1-9ef9-4647-9ae5-843e6b214cce langcode: - value: en type: - target_id: daily_email target_type: node_type target_uuid: 8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7 revision_timestamp: - value: '2025-05-11T09:00:34+00:00' revision_uid: - target_type: user target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849 revision_log: { } status: - value: true uid: - target_type: user target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849 title: - value: | Don't estimate separately for testing created: - value: '2023-08-13T00:00:00+00:00' changed: - value: '2025-05-11T09:00:34+00:00' promote: - value: false sticky: - value: false default_langcode: - value: true revision_translation_affected: - value: true path: - alias: /daily/2023/08/13/dont-estimate-separately-for-testing langcode: en body: - value: |
A common issue I see for people introducing automated testing is estimating the testing and implementation of a task separately.
Something like, "It'll take x to do the work and x to write the tests for it".
As well as implying you'd write all the code and then all the tests or vice versa, if you provide separate estimates, it's easy for someone to think the tests are optional and can be removed.
If you provide one estimate for both, this can't happen.
format: full_html processed: |A common issue I see for people introducing automated testing is estimating the testing and implementation of a task separately.
Something like, "It'll take x to do the work and x to write the tests for it".
As well as implying you'd write all the code and then all the tests or vice versa, if you provide separate estimates, it's easy for someone to think the tests are optional and can be removed.
If you provide one estimate for both, this can't happen.
summary: null field_daily_email_cta: { }