{ "uuid": [ { "value": "10105b0a-c18f-4b77-8ac9-bec3250e37b7" } ], "langcode": [ { "value": "en" } ], "type": [ { "target_id": "daily_email", "target_type": "node_type", "target_uuid": "8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7" } ], "revision_timestamp": [ { "value": "2025-05-11T09:00:44+00:00" } ], "revision_uid": [ { "target_type": "user", "target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849" } ], "revision_log": [], "status": [ { "value": true } ], "uid": [ { "target_type": "user", "target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849" } ], "title": [ { "value": "just vs make\n" } ], "created": [ { "value": "2023-04-11T00:00:00+00:00" } ], "changed": [ { "value": "2025-05-11T09:00:44+00:00" } ], "promote": [ { "value": false } ], "sticky": [ { "value": false } ], "default_langcode": [ { "value": true } ], "revision_translation_affected": [ { "value": true } ], "path": [ { "alias": "\/daily\/2023\/04\/11\/just-vs-make", "langcode": "en" } ], "body": [ { "value": "\n
A Makefile needs to use tabs. Justfiles are more flexible and work with tabs or any number of spaces.<\/p>\n\n With a Makefile, you need to declare some targets as \"phony\". I believe that this is for targets that don't generate artifact files with that name, so as I'm not compiling and building files with This is how a With this, I'd expect to be able to pass arguments to it - e.g. But, instead of seeing the expected output, I get an error: This is what I'd need to do to pass arguments to the Now I can run Here, I can create as many named parameters as needed and use them in the recipe with the syntax that I wanted - I can think of a few others but this is is the main reason why I moved from A Makefile needs to use tabs. Justfiles are more flexible and work with tabs or any number of spaces.<\/p>\n\n With a Makefile, you need to declare some targets as \"phony\". I believe that this is for targets that don't generate artifact files with that name, so as I'm not compiling and building files with This is how a With this, I'd expect to be able to pass arguments to it - e.g. But, instead of seeing the expected output, I get an error: This is what I'd need to do to pass arguments to the Now I can run Here, I can create as many named parameters as needed and use them in the recipe with the syntax that I wanted - I can think of a few others but this is is the main reason why I moved from just<\/code> compared to
make<\/code> is something that was asked during my PHP London talk, and whilst they are similar,
just<\/code> has differences for me that explains why I use it:<\/p>\n\n
Tabs or spaces<\/h2>\n\n
.PHONY<\/h2>\n\n
make<\/code>, this is redundant and adds visual noise.<\/p>\n\n
Passing arguments<\/h2>\n\n
composer<\/code> target looks like in a Makefile:<\/p>\n\n
composer:\n docker compose exec php composer\n<\/code><\/pre>\n\n
make composer info drupal\/core<\/code>.<\/p>\n\n
make: *** No rule to make target 'info'. \u00a0Stop.<\/code>.<\/p>\n\n
composer<\/code> target:<\/p>\n\n
composer:\n docker compose exec php composer $(COMPOSER_ARGS)\n<\/code><\/pre>\n\n
make composer COMPOSER_ARGS=\"info drupal\/core\"<\/code> and see what I was expecting but the syntax isn't what I'd want.<\/p>\n\n
just<\/code>, on the other hand, allows for defining parameters to its recipes:<\/p>\n\n
composer *args:\n\u00a0 docker compose exec php composer \n<\/code><\/pre>\n\n
just composer info drupal\/core<\/code>.<\/p>\n\n
make<\/code> and later adopted
just<\/code>.<\/p>\n\n
just<\/code>, for me, gives the flexibilty that I need whilst using a simple and familiar syntax but without some of the confusing and complicated behaviours of
make<\/code>.<\/p>\n\n ",
"format": "full_html",
"processed": "\n
just<\/code> compared to
make<\/code> is something that was asked during my PHP London talk, and whilst they are similar,
just<\/code> has differences for me that explains why I use it:<\/p>\n\n
Tabs or spaces<\/h2>\n\n
.PHONY<\/h2>\n\n
make<\/code>, this is redundant and adds visual noise.<\/p>\n\n
Passing arguments<\/h2>\n\n
composer<\/code> target looks like in a Makefile:<\/p>\n\n
composer:\n docker compose exec php composer\n<\/code><\/pre>\n\n
make composer info drupal\/core<\/code>.<\/p>\n\n
make: *** No rule to make target 'info'. Stop.<\/code>.<\/p>\n\n
composer<\/code> target:<\/p>\n\n
composer:\n docker compose exec php composer $(COMPOSER_ARGS)\n<\/code><\/pre>\n\n
make composer COMPOSER_ARGS=\"info drupal\/core\"<\/code> and see what I was expecting but the syntax isn't what I'd want.<\/p>\n\n
just<\/code>, on the other hand, allows for defining parameters to its recipes:<\/p>\n\n
composer *args:\n docker compose exec php composer \n<\/code><\/pre>\n\n
just composer info drupal\/core<\/code>.<\/p>\n\n
make<\/code> and later adopted
just<\/code>.<\/p>\n\n
just<\/code>, for me, gives the flexibilty that I need whilst using a simple and familiar syntax but without some of the confusing and complicated behaviours of
make<\/code>.<\/p>\n\n ",
"summary": null
}
],
"feeds_item": [
{
"imported": "1970-01-01T00:33:45+00:00",
"guid": null,
"hash": "0747677b2ea7269056a31e78221a91aa",
"target_type": "feeds_feed",
"target_uuid": "90c85284-7ca8-4074-9178-97ff8384fe76"
}
]
}