{
    "uuid": [
        {
            "value": "01f3b831-e981-471f-aef9-076b054e3495"
        }
    ],
    "langcode": [
        {
            "value": "en"
        }
    ],
    "type": [
        {
            "target_id": "daily_email",
            "target_type": "node_type",
            "target_uuid": "8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7"
        }
    ],
    "revision_timestamp": [
        {
            "value": "2025-05-11T09:00:36+00:00"
        }
    ],
    "revision_uid": [
        {
            "target_type": "user",
            "target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
        }
    ],
    "revision_log": [],
    "status": [
        {
            "value": true
        }
    ],
    "uid": [
        {
            "target_type": "user",
            "target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
        }
    ],
    "title": [
        {
            "value": "Testing is all about confidence\n"
        }
    ],
    "created": [
        {
            "value": "2023-07-24T00:00:00+00:00"
        }
    ],
    "changed": [
        {
            "value": "2025-05-11T09:00:36+00:00"
        }
    ],
    "promote": [
        {
            "value": false
        }
    ],
    "sticky": [
        {
            "value": false
        }
    ],
    "default_langcode": [
        {
            "value": true
        }
    ],
    "revision_translation_affected": [
        {
            "value": true
        }
    ],
    "path": [
        {
            "alias": "\/daily\/2023\/07\/24\/testing-is-all-about-confidence",
            "langcode": "en"
        }
    ],
    "body": [
        {
            "value": "\n          <p>Testing - manual or automated - is about building confidence.<\/p>\n\n<p>If we deploy this change or release this feature, are we confident it will work as expected and not cause regressions elsewhere?<\/p>\n\n<p>What if someone asked you on a scale between one and ten?<\/p>\n\n<p>From an automated perspective, have you written enough tests for the feature to be confident it works?<\/p>\n\n<p>If you're fixing a bug, do you have a test that reproduces the bug that was originally failing but now passing since you've added the fix?<\/p>\n\n<p>Do the tests have enough assertions, and have you covered enough use cases and scenarios?<\/p>\n\n<h2 id=\"here%27s-the-thing\">Here's the thing<\/h2>\n\n<p>You can utilise code coverage metrics, but no hard rule says that the feature will work once x percentage is covered. Something with 100% coverage can still contain bugs.<\/p>\n\n<p>For me, it's about the answer to the question:<\/p>\n\n<p>If we deploy this change, how confident are you that it will work as expected?<\/p>\n\n        ",
            "format": "full_html",
            "processed": "\n          <p>Testing - manual or automated - is about building confidence.<\/p>\n\n<p>If we deploy this change or release this feature, are we confident it will work as expected and not cause regressions elsewhere?<\/p>\n\n<p>What if someone asked you on a scale between one and ten?<\/p>\n\n<p>From an automated perspective, have you written enough tests for the feature to be confident it works?<\/p>\n\n<p>If you're fixing a bug, do you have a test that reproduces the bug that was originally failing but now passing since you've added the fix?<\/p>\n\n<p>Do the tests have enough assertions, and have you covered enough use cases and scenarios?<\/p>\n\n<h2 id=\"here%27s-the-thing\">Here's the thing<\/h2>\n\n<p>You can utilise code coverage metrics, but no hard rule says that the feature will work once x percentage is covered. Something with 100% coverage can still contain bugs.<\/p>\n\n<p>For me, it's about the answer to the question:<\/p>\n\n<p>If we deploy this change, how confident are you that it will work as expected?<\/p>\n\n        ",
            "summary": null
        }
    ]
}