{
    "uuid": [
        {
            "value": "0da14ab3-af09-42cf-9813-877a7a66cf87"
        }
    ],
    "langcode": [
        {
            "value": "en"
        }
    ],
    "type": [
        {
            "target_id": "daily_email",
            "target_type": "node_type",
            "target_uuid": "8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7"
        }
    ],
    "revision_timestamp": [
        {
            "value": "2025-05-11T09:00:06+00:00"
        }
    ],
    "revision_uid": [
        {
            "target_type": "user",
            "target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
        }
    ],
    "revision_log": [],
    "status": [
        {
            "value": true
        }
    ],
    "uid": [
        {
            "target_type": "user",
            "target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
        }
    ],
    "title": [
        {
            "value": "Is post-end-of-live support an anti-pattern?"
        }
    ],
    "created": [
        {
            "value": "2024-10-06T00:00:00+00:00"
        }
    ],
    "changed": [
        {
            "value": "2025-05-11T09:00:06+00:00"
        }
    ],
    "promote": [
        {
            "value": false
        }
    ],
    "sticky": [
        {
            "value": false
        }
    ],
    "default_langcode": [
        {
            "value": true
        }
    ],
    "revision_translation_affected": [
        {
            "value": true
        }
    ],
    "path": [
        {
            "alias": "\/daily\/2024\/10\/06\/is-post-end-of-live-support-an-anti-pattern",
            "langcode": "en"
        }
    ],
    "body": [
        {
            "value": "\n          <p>With Drupal 7's end-of-life date of the 5th of January 2025 quickly approaching, I've recently seen again a number of companies offering support for Drupal 7 after its end-of-life date.<\/p>\n\n<p>I've seen the same in corporate IT environments where they're running versions of software post their EOL date, so it's not only Drupal 7, but I wonder if this is a good thing?<\/p>\n\n<p>Is this deterring companies from upgrading if they know this is an option, or should everyone upgrade and we can move forward from Drupal 7 and other end-of-life software?<\/p>\n\n<p>According to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.drupal.org\/project\/usage\/drupal\">https:\/\/www.drupal.org\/project\/usage\/drupal<\/a>, there are still 281,000 active Drupal 7 installations.<\/p>\n\n<p>It's considerably less than before - this  time last year, it was over 380,000 installations - but it's still a lot of Drupal 7 being used.<\/p>\n\n        ",
            "format": "full_html",
            "processed": "\n          <p>With Drupal 7's end-of-life date of the 5th of January 2025 quickly approaching, I've recently seen again a number of companies offering support for Drupal 7 after its end-of-life date.<\/p>\n\n<p>I've seen the same in corporate IT environments where they're running versions of software post their EOL date, so it's not only Drupal 7, but I wonder if this is a good thing?<\/p>\n\n<p>Is this deterring companies from upgrading if they know this is an option, or should everyone upgrade and we can move forward from Drupal 7 and other end-of-life software?<\/p>\n\n<p>According to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.drupal.org\/project\/usage\/drupal\">https:\/\/www.drupal.org\/project\/usage\/drupal<\/a>, there are still 281,000 active Drupal 7 installations.<\/p>\n\n<p>It's considerably less than before - this  time last year, it was over 380,000 installations - but it's still a lot of Drupal 7 being used.<\/p>\n\n        ",
            "summary": null
        }
    ]
}