uuid: - value: 13e1b1ea-a0df-43b2-8f1b-e8340bb62df8 langcode: - value: en type: - target_id: daily_email target_type: node_type target_uuid: 8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7 revision_timestamp: - value: '2025-05-11T09:00:40+00:00' revision_uid: - target_type: user target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849 revision_log: { } status: - value: true uid: - target_type: user target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849 title: - value: | A minor breaking change created: - value: '2023-05-20T00:00:00+00:00' changed: - value: '2025-05-11T09:00:40+00:00' promote: - value: false sticky: - value: false default_langcode: - value: true revision_translation_affected: - value: true path: - alias: /daily/2023/05/20/a-minor-breaking-change langcode: en body: - value: |

Today, in the repository of an open-source project, I saw an issue comment saying, "This is a minor breaking change.".

It detailed what was removed and suggested an alternative.

I don't know how you define a "minor" breaking change.

Is it because it's a single line and easy to replace, or is it part of the code that is rarely used by consumers and less likely to cause an issue?

Regardless, if it's a breaking change, anyone using that project will need to update their code if they use something that was removed, whether it's minor or not.

format: full_html processed: |

Today, in the repository of an open-source project, I saw an issue comment saying, "This is a minor breaking change.".

It detailed what was removed and suggested an alternative.

I don't know how you define a "minor" breaking change.

Is it because it's a single line and easy to replace, or is it part of the code that is rarely used by consumers and less likely to cause an issue?

Regardless, if it's a breaking change, anyone using that project will need to update their code if they use something that was removed, whether it's minor or not.

summary: null field_daily_email_cta: { }