--- title: Keep logic within tests for as long as you can date: 2024-02-16 permalink: daily/2024/02/16/keep-logic-within-tests-for-as-long-as-you-can snippet: | Making the easy change to get a test to pass might mean you write more logic in your tests than you expect, at least to begin with. tags: - software-development - automated-testing - test-driven-development - drupal - php - phpunit --- Inspired by some recent podcast guests, I've started writing the first code for a Drupal-based SaaS product that I've been thinking of creating. Here's an early iteration of the first test I wrote: ```language-php public function test_it_creates_a_project_node_from_json(): void { self::assertNull(Node::load(id: 1)); $this->installEntitySchema(entity_type_id: 'node'); $this->installConfig(modules: self::$modules); $projectData = json_decode(json: self::$projectJson, associative: TRUE); self::assertNotNull($projectData); Node::create([ 'title' => $projectData['list'][0]['title'], 'type' => 'drupal_project', ])->save(); $node = Node::load(id: 1); self::assertNotNull($node); self::assertInstanceOf(actual: $node, expected: NodeInterface::class); self::assertSame(actual: $node->label(), expected: 'Override Node Options'); self::assertSame( actual: $node->get('field_drupalorg_node_id')->getString(), expected: strval(107871), ); } ``` It checks that, given some defined JSON data, it will create a node in my database. It confirms no node ID exists when starting, runs some setup setups (this is a Kernel test), decodes the JSON, creates the node and asserts it contains the expected values. There are two things that you may be wondering... * Why do you have test setup code that you'll need within the test? Won't you need that for every test? * Why are you creating the node within the test and not somewhere else? The answer to both is that this is the first test, and I want to write **as little code as possible for it to pass**. When I write the second test, I'll either need to duplicate the setup lines or extract them to a `setUp()` method. I'll also need to refactor the code that creates the node. Once I've written the second test, to get it to pass, I refactored to use Repository, Builder and Action classes. If there's a regression, the test I had will fail, and I could revert to the passing version before reattempting the refactor. With test-driven development, I want to work in small and simple steps and get to green by making the smallest and easiest possible change. When I have a test that forces me to refactor and adopt a more complex approach, I'll do it.