Add daily email for 2025-02-03
Good software is easy to test
This commit is contained in:
parent
6abb9b8a64
commit
fb05247c33
31
source/_daily_emails/2025-02-03.md
Normal file
31
source/_daily_emails/2025-02-03.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: Good software is easy to test
|
||||
date: 2025-02-03
|
||||
permalink: daily/2025/02/03/testable
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- software-development
|
||||
- testing
|
||||
cta: testing_course
|
||||
snippet: |
|
||||
Good software is easy to write automated tests for.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
One piece of criteria for whether some software is good is whether it's easy to write automated tests for.
|
||||
|
||||
I recently worked on a method that was more than 150 lines.
|
||||
|
||||
It was difficult to understand, had too many responsibilities and didn't use dependency injection.
|
||||
|
||||
This made it difficult to test.
|
||||
|
||||
If it was split into several smaller methods or classes, each could be responsible for different aspects and have clear responsibilities.
|
||||
|
||||
Each new method or class could have its own tests to verify its own functionality works.
|
||||
|
||||
It would be easy to understand and identify and fix any issues.
|
||||
|
||||
If dependency injection was used, things can be mocked or changed as needed to make the logic testable.
|
||||
|
||||
If everything is in one large function, the code isn't testable.
|
||||
|
||||
Even if it works now, it will be difficult to change in the future.
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue