Add daily email for 2024-04-19
When should you tag 1.0?
This commit is contained in:
parent
3b5c6e429a
commit
ebab457dea
25
source/_daily_emails/2024-04-19.md
Normal file
25
source/_daily_emails/2024-04-19.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
title: When should you tag 1.0?
|
||||||
|
date: 2024-04-19
|
||||||
|
permalink: archive/2024/04/19/when-should-you-tag-1-0
|
||||||
|
tags:
|
||||||
|
- software-development
|
||||||
|
- open-source
|
||||||
|
cta: ~
|
||||||
|
snippet: |
|
||||||
|
When should you tag version 1.0 of your project?
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Something I've seen, both with contributed Drupal modules and other open-source projects, over the past few years is they spend a lot of time in the 0.x versions or releasing alpha and beta versions rather than releasing a 1.0 or stable version.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I presume it's a concern around backward compatibility and maintaining that once a stable version is released.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
But, if you want people to use your module or upgrade it to the latest version, that's much easier to do once there's a stable version.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Some organisations prohibit using alpha or unstable versions of projects so, if there isn't a stable version, they wouldn't be able to use it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Personally, if I'm using one of my open-source modules, plugins or libraries in production, there should be a stable 1.0 version tagged.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Once it's in production, I'm already making an implied commitment that it's going to be stable and I won't break everything in the next release, so why not make that explicit and tag a stable release?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Version numbers are free and nothing is stopping you from deprecating code and releasing a new major version with breaking changes in the future, so go ahead and tag that stable version.
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue