daily-email: add 2023-08-21
Which part of the CI pipeline has the most value?
This commit is contained in:
parent
40ff4dd17e
commit
ae87cbb269
1 changed files with 27 additions and 0 deletions
27
src/content/daily-email/2023-08-21.md
Normal file
27
src/content/daily-email/2023-08-21.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
title: >
|
||||||
|
Which part of the CI pipeline has the most value?
|
||||||
|
pubDate: 2023-08-21
|
||||||
|
permalink: >
|
||||||
|
archive/2023/08/21/which-part-of-the-ci-pipeline-has-the-most-value
|
||||||
|
tags:
|
||||||
|
- continuous-integration
|
||||||
|
- automated-testing
|
||||||
|
- static-analysis
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The main part of my CI pipeline tasks are running the automated tests, coding standards checks and static analysis.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
But which of these are the most valuable?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I used to run the coding standards check first as it was the quickest, followed by static analysis and the automated tests.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If a task were going to fail, it would fail quickly.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
But is that the objective of the CI pipeline?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Whilst it needs to be quick, the main reason to run these is to ensure things work as expected.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Recently, I changed my pipelines to run the tests first, as these verify the code's behaviour.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I want to know if the code works but has a coding standard error that needs to be fixed rather than the pipeline failing on the error and not knowing whether the code works.
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue