opdavies/oliverdavies.uk
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 1 Pull requests Projects 1 Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

tome export

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Oliver Davies 2025-05-11 09:40:11 +01:00
parent 328502c279
commit ac1484b1e0
5044 changed files with 111225 additions and 224219 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

100
content/node.0da14ab3-af09-42cf-9813-877a7a66cf87.json Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
{
"uuid": [
{
"value": "0da14ab3-af09-42cf-9813-877a7a66cf87"
}
],
"langcode": [
{
"value": "en"
}
],
"type": [
{
"target_id": "daily_email",
"target_type": "node_type",
"target_uuid": "8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7"
}
],
"revision_timestamp": [
{
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:06+00:00"
}
],
"revision_uid": [
{
"target_type": "user",
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
}
],
"revision_log": [],
"status": [
{
"value": true
}
],
"uid": [
{
"target_type": "user",
"target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
}
],
"title": [
{
"value": "Is post-end-of-live support an anti-pattern?"
}
],
"created": [
{
"value": "2024-10-06T00:00:00+00:00"
}
],
"changed": [
{
"value": "2025-05-11T09:00:06+00:00"
}
],
"promote": [
{
"value": false
}
],
"sticky": [
{
"value": false
}
],
"default_langcode": [
{
"value": true
}
],
"revision_translation_affected": [
{
"value": true
}
],
"path": [
{
"alias": "\/daily\/2024\/10\/06\/is-post-end-of-live-support-an-anti-pattern",
"langcode": "en"
}
],
"body": [
{
"value": "\n <p>With Drupal 7's end-of-life date of the 5th of January 2025 quickly approaching, I've recently seen again a number of companies offering support for Drupal 7 after its end-of-life date.<\/p>\n\n<p>I've seen the same in corporate IT environments where they're running versions of software post their EOL date, so it's not only Drupal 7, but I wonder if this is a good thing?<\/p>\n\n<p>Is this deterring companies from upgrading if they know this is an option, or should everyone upgrade and we can move forward from Drupal 7 and other end-of-life software?<\/p>\n\n<p>According to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.drupal.org\/project\/usage\/drupal\">https:\/\/www.drupal.org\/project\/usage\/drupal<\/a>, there are still 281,000 active Drupal 7 installations.<\/p>\n\n<p>It's considerably less than before - this time last year, it was over 380,000 installations - but it's still a lot of Drupal 7 being used.<\/p>\n\n ",
"format": "full_html",
"processed": "\n <p>With Drupal 7's end-of-life date of the 5th of January 2025 quickly approaching, I've recently seen again a number of companies offering support for Drupal 7 after its end-of-life date.<\/p>\n\n<p>I've seen the same in corporate IT environments where they're running versions of software post their EOL date, so it's not only Drupal 7, but I wonder if this is a good thing?<\/p>\n\n<p>Is this deterring companies from upgrading if they know this is an option, or should everyone upgrade and we can move forward from Drupal 7 and other end-of-life software?<\/p>\n\n<p>According to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.drupal.org\/project\/usage\/drupal\">https:\/\/www.drupal.org\/project\/usage\/drupal<\/a>, there are still 281,000 active Drupal 7 installations.<\/p>\n\n<p>It's considerably less than before - this time last year, it was over 380,000 installations - but it's still a lot of Drupal 7 being used.<\/p>\n\n ",
"summary": null
}
],
"feeds_item": [
{
"imported": "2025-05-11T09:00:06+00:00",
"guid": null,
"hash": "e3227fd692a43f0f5a3b4f9afed9df94",
"target_type": "feeds_feed",
"target_uuid": "90c85284-7ca8-4074-9178-97ff8384fe76"
}
]
}