Update 2017-05-20-turning-your-custom-drupal-module-into-a-feature.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
b935c60261
commit
a89c270c84
|
@ -8,17 +8,17 @@ tags:
|
|||
slug: turning-drupal-module-into-feature
|
||||
---
|
||||
{% block excerpt %}
|
||||
Yesterday I was fixing a bug in an inherited Drupal 7 custom module, and I decided that I was going to add some tests to ensure that the bug was fixed and doesn’t get accidentially re-introduced in the future. The test though required me to have a particular content type and fields which are specific to this site, so aren't present within the standard installation profile used to run tests.
|
||||
Yesterday I was fixing a bug in an inherited Drupal 7 custom module, and I decided that I was going to add some tests to ensure that the bug was fixed and doesn’t get accidentially re-introduced in the future. The test though required me to have a particular content type and fields which are specific to this site, so weren’t present within the standard installation profile used to run tests.
|
||||
|
||||
I decided to convert the custom module into a [Feature][0] so that the content type and it’s fields could be added to it, and present on the testing site once the module is installed.
|
||||
I decided to convert the custom module into a [Feature][0] so that the content type and it’s fields could be added to it, and therefore present on the testing site once the module is installed.
|
||||
|
||||
To do this, I needed to expose the module to the Features API.
|
||||
{% endblock %}
|
||||
|
||||
{% block content %}
|
||||
Yesterday I was fixing a bug in an inherited Drupal 7 custom module, and I decided that I was going to add some tests to ensure that the bug was fixed and doesn’t get accidentially re-introduced in the future. The test though required me to have a particular content type and fields which are specific to this site, so aren't present within the standard installation profile used to run tests.
|
||||
Yesterday I was fixing a bug in an inherited Drupal 7 custom module, and I decided that I was going to add some tests to ensure that the bug was fixed and doesn’t get accidentially re-introduced in the future. The test though required me to have a particular content type and fields which are specific to this site, so weren’t present within the standard installation profile used to run tests.
|
||||
|
||||
I decided to convert the custom module into a [Feature][0] so that the content type and it’s fields could be added to it, and present on the testing site once the module is installed.
|
||||
I decided to convert the custom module into a [Feature][0] so that the content type and it’s fields could be added to it, and therefore present on the testing site once the module is installed.
|
||||
|
||||
To do this, I needed to expose the module to the Features API.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue