Migrate content to YAML
This commit is contained in:
parent
3d76aa0c3b
commit
9d5a930eab
4550 changed files with 93849 additions and 129734 deletions
87
content/node.52d92e80-5970-4525-b4b6-b30562f5573c.yml
Normal file
87
content/node.52d92e80-5970-4525-b4b6-b30562f5573c.yml
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
|
|||
uuid:
|
||||
- value: 52d92e80-5970-4525-b4b6-b30562f5573c
|
||||
langcode:
|
||||
- value: en
|
||||
type:
|
||||
- target_id: daily_email
|
||||
target_type: node_type
|
||||
target_uuid: 8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7
|
||||
revision_timestamp:
|
||||
- value: '2025-07-09T23:07:33+00:00'
|
||||
revision_uid:
|
||||
- target_type: user
|
||||
target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849
|
||||
revision_log: { }
|
||||
status:
|
||||
- value: true
|
||||
uid:
|
||||
- target_type: user
|
||||
target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849
|
||||
title:
|
||||
- value: 'What type of change are you making?'
|
||||
created:
|
||||
- value: '2025-07-06T23:06:53+00:00'
|
||||
changed:
|
||||
- value: '2025-07-09T23:07:33+00:00'
|
||||
promote:
|
||||
- value: false
|
||||
sticky:
|
||||
- value: false
|
||||
default_langcode:
|
||||
- value: true
|
||||
revision_translation_affected:
|
||||
- value: true
|
||||
path:
|
||||
- alias: /daily/2025/07/06/what-type-change-are-you-making
|
||||
langcode: en
|
||||
body:
|
||||
- value: |-
|
||||
Whilst I don't use the [conventional commits][0] approach to writing commit messages any more, I still think it's important to think about the type of change when a commit is made to a code repository.
|
||||
|
||||
Are you adding a new feature?
|
||||
|
||||
Are you fixing a bug?
|
||||
|
||||
Are you refactoring some code?
|
||||
|
||||
Conventional commits has you add keywords like `feat`, `fix`, `chore` and `refactor` to the commit message to identify the type of change being committed.
|
||||
|
||||
I don't add it to the commit message, but I do ask myself the same question.
|
||||
|
||||
What type of change is this?
|
||||
|
||||
If it's more than one, it probably needs to be split into separate commits.
|
||||
|
||||
This makes the intent clearer and the change easier to review.
|
||||
|
||||
If you need to refactor some code before adding a feature, they should be two separate commits.
|
||||
|
||||
If you're fixing a bug, commit a failing test first so it can be easily seen and then commit the fix that makes the test pass.
|
||||
|
||||
## Here's the thing
|
||||
|
||||
Having one change per commit makes it easier to write good commit messages as the change is simpler to explain.
|
||||
|
||||
If a commit includes multiple changes, it is more difficult and causes commit messages like `Updates` or `wip` - which I try to avoid, especially on client and open source projects.
|
||||
|
||||
[0]: /daily/2022/09/01/conventional-commits-changelogs
|
||||
format: markdown
|
||||
processed: |
|
||||
<p>Whilst I don't use the <a href="http://default/daily/2022/09/01/conventional-commits-changelogs">conventional commits</a> approach to writing commit messages any more, I still think it's important to think about the type of change when a commit is made to a code repository.</p>
|
||||
<p>Are you adding a new feature?</p>
|
||||
<p>Are you fixing a bug?</p>
|
||||
<p>Are you refactoring some code?</p>
|
||||
<p>Conventional commits has you add keywords like <code>feat</code>, <code>fix</code>, <code>chore</code> and <code>refactor</code> to the commit message to identify the type of change being committed.</p>
|
||||
<p>I don't add it to the commit message, but I do ask myself the same question.</p>
|
||||
<p>What type of change is this?</p>
|
||||
<p>If it's more than one, it probably needs to be split into separate commits.</p>
|
||||
<p>This makes the intent clearer and the change easier to review.</p>
|
||||
<p>If you need to refactor some code before adding a feature, they should be two separate commits.</p>
|
||||
<p>If you're fixing a bug, commit a failing test first so it can be easily seen and then commit the fix that makes the test pass.</p>
|
||||
<h2>Here's the thing</h2>
|
||||
<p>Having one change per commit makes it easier to write good commit messages as the change is simpler to explain.</p>
|
||||
<p>If a commit includes multiple changes, it is more difficult and causes commit messages like <code>Updates</code> or <code>wip</code> - which I try to avoid, especially on client and open source projects.</p>
|
||||
summary: ''
|
||||
field_daily_email_cta:
|
||||
- target_type: node
|
||||
target_uuid: c74de3cf-5362-4d08-935a-a9d0d22fcb94
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue