Migrate content to YAML
This commit is contained in:
parent
3d76aa0c3b
commit
9d5a930eab
4550 changed files with 93849 additions and 129734 deletions
92
content/node.0f327d3d-33ce-498a-9234-6c1fe9f51d6a.yml
Normal file
92
content/node.0f327d3d-33ce-498a-9234-6c1fe9f51d6a.yml
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
|
|||
uuid:
|
||||
- value: 0f327d3d-33ce-498a-9234-6c1fe9f51d6a
|
||||
langcode:
|
||||
- value: en
|
||||
type:
|
||||
- target_id: daily_email
|
||||
target_type: node_type
|
||||
target_uuid: 8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7
|
||||
revision_timestamp:
|
||||
- value: '2025-05-11T09:00:20+00:00'
|
||||
revision_uid:
|
||||
- target_type: user
|
||||
target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849
|
||||
revision_log: { }
|
||||
status:
|
||||
- value: true
|
||||
uid:
|
||||
- target_type: user
|
||||
target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849
|
||||
title:
|
||||
- value: 'Do you really need it?'
|
||||
created:
|
||||
- value: '2024-02-10T00:00:00+00:00'
|
||||
changed:
|
||||
- value: '2025-05-11T09:00:20+00:00'
|
||||
promote:
|
||||
- value: false
|
||||
sticky:
|
||||
- value: false
|
||||
default_langcode:
|
||||
- value: true
|
||||
revision_translation_affected:
|
||||
- value: true
|
||||
path:
|
||||
- alias: /daily/2024/02/10/do-you-really-need-it
|
||||
langcode: en
|
||||
body:
|
||||
- value: |
|
||||
<p>Before adding a new feature or change to a codebase, ask if it's really needed and consider its long-term implications.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Code is easy to write, but needs to be maintained as newer language or framework features are added or have breaking changes.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Something I've added recently to Build Configs was an option to use an <a href="/daily/2024/01/27/gitignore-inclusive-or-exclusive">inclusive or exclusive .gitignore file</a>.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Whilst it's only adding an if condition based on a value, it adds a separate path in my code and both need to be maintained.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>I've been thinking of adding <code>just</code> again to some projects instead of a <code>run</code> file, which would add separate files that need to be maintained and kept up-to-date with each other so both offer the same features.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Is this something I want to maintain going forward? Does it add enough value to justify its maintenance?</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Different to a feature flag, which usually has a known lifespan, this could need be maintained for the whole lifespan of the application.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>On a client project, this could be having two sets of buttons with rounded and square corners.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Do we need both?</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>It could be the positioning of a title in a header. Fewer options mean there is less code to write and maintain.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>In a Drupal project, each choice could mean adding a different field, taxonomy term, or content or block type to achieve the desired result.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The more we can achieve with fewer options means the application will be easier to maintain and work on in the future.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
format: full_html
|
||||
processed: |
|
||||
<p>Before adding a new feature or change to a codebase, ask if it's really needed and consider its long-term implications.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Code is easy to write, but needs to be maintained as newer language or framework features are added or have breaking changes.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Something I've added recently to Build Configs was an option to use an <a href="http://default/daily/2024/01/27/gitignore-inclusive-or-exclusive">inclusive or exclusive .gitignore file</a>.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Whilst it's only adding an if condition based on a value, it adds a separate path in my code and both need to be maintained.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>I've been thinking of adding <code>just</code> again to some projects instead of a <code>run</code> file, which would add separate files that need to be maintained and kept up-to-date with each other so both offer the same features.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Is this something I want to maintain going forward? Does it add enough value to justify its maintenance?</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Different to a feature flag, which usually has a known lifespan, this could need be maintained for the whole lifespan of the application.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>On a client project, this could be having two sets of buttons with rounded and square corners.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Do we need both?</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>It could be the positioning of a title in a header. Fewer options mean there is less code to write and maintain.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>In a Drupal project, each choice could mean adding a different field, taxonomy term, or content or block type to achieve the desired result.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The more we can achieve with fewer options means the application will be easier to maintain and work on in the future.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
summary: null
|
||||
field_daily_email_cta: { }
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue