Make all links relative

Now the abs_to_rel module is enabled, links can be made relative so they
work on the current environment.

content/node.0fb3ebe0-46c3-4e9c-9961-e62aa512fab3.json

@@ -82,9 +82,9 @@
     ],
     "body": [
         {
-            "value": "\n          <p>Note: The numbers within this post are taken from my <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oliverdavies.uk\/presentations\/tdd-test-driven-drupal\">Test-Driven Drupal talk<\/a>, in which I also talk about this.<\/p>\n\n<p>My first commit to the 7.x-1.x branch of the Override Node Options module was in March 2012. According to Drupal.org, the module was used on 9,212 websites then.<\/p>\n\n<p>As well as the 7.x-1.x branch, there's the 8.x-2.x branch which supports Drupal 9 and 10, and previously Drupal 8.<\/p>\n\n<p>The most recent statistics show the module is currently used on 34,981 websites and is consistently around 35,000.<\/p>\n\n<h2 id=\"what-does-that-mean%3F\">What does that mean?<\/h2>\n\n<p>The module is considered feature complete, but I'm not ruling out any new additions.<\/p>\n\n<p>The main thing is ensuring that any changes don't break 35,000 websites!<\/p>\n\n<p>I do this by relying on the module's automated test suite and ensuring that tests are added for any features or bugs and that the tests are passing before any new release.<\/p>\n\n<h2 id=\"this-has-worked-well\">This has worked well<\/h2>\n\n<p>A few years ago, I committed a feature request to both versions. While it didn't include additional tests, I verified the existing functionality worked after resolving a large merge conflict by ensuring the original tests passed.<\/p>\n\n<p>More recently, a colleague and I refactored the module and split each override into its own class, making adding and maintaining overrides easier.<\/p>\n\n<p>Because the tests were still passing, we knew our refactor was successful and not causing regressions.<\/p>\n\n<h2 id=\"here%27s-the-thing\">Here's the thing<\/h2>\n\n<p>Having automated tests and ensuring they're always passing has allowed me to add features and refactor code that I wouldn't have done or had the confidence to do otherwise.<\/p>\n\n<p>It's great to have a popular module, but on the other hand, I don't want to break 35,000 websites which makes the tests invaluable.<\/p>\n\n        ",
+            "value": "\n          <p>Note: The numbers within this post are taken from my <a href=\"/presentations\/tdd-test-driven-drupal\">Test-Driven Drupal talk<\/a>, in which I also talk about this.<\/p>\n\n<p>My first commit to the 7.x-1.x branch of the Override Node Options module was in March 2012. According to Drupal.org, the module was used on 9,212 websites then.<\/p>\n\n<p>As well as the 7.x-1.x branch, there's the 8.x-2.x branch which supports Drupal 9 and 10, and previously Drupal 8.<\/p>\n\n<p>The most recent statistics show the module is currently used on 34,981 websites and is consistently around 35,000.<\/p>\n\n<h2 id=\"what-does-that-mean%3F\">What does that mean?<\/h2>\n\n<p>The module is considered feature complete, but I'm not ruling out any new additions.<\/p>\n\n<p>The main thing is ensuring that any changes don't break 35,000 websites!<\/p>\n\n<p>I do this by relying on the module's automated test suite and ensuring that tests are added for any features or bugs and that the tests are passing before any new release.<\/p>\n\n<h2 id=\"this-has-worked-well\">This has worked well<\/h2>\n\n<p>A few years ago, I committed a feature request to both versions. While it didn't include additional tests, I verified the existing functionality worked after resolving a large merge conflict by ensuring the original tests passed.<\/p>\n\n<p>More recently, a colleague and I refactored the module and split each override into its own class, making adding and maintaining overrides easier.<\/p>\n\n<p>Because the tests were still passing, we knew our refactor was successful and not causing regressions.<\/p>\n\n<h2 id=\"here%27s-the-thing\">Here's the thing<\/h2>\n\n<p>Having automated tests and ensuring they're always passing has allowed me to add features and refactor code that I wouldn't have done or had the confidence to do otherwise.<\/p>\n\n<p>It's great to have a popular module, but on the other hand, I don't want to break 35,000 websites which makes the tests invaluable.<\/p>\n\n        ",
             "format": "full_html",
-            "processed": "\n          <p>Note: The numbers within this post are taken from my <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oliverdavies.uk\/presentations\/tdd-test-driven-drupal\">Test-Driven Drupal talk<\/a>, in which I also talk about this.<\/p>\n\n<p>My first commit to the 7.x-1.x branch of the Override Node Options module was in March 2012. According to Drupal.org, the module was used on 9,212 websites then.<\/p>\n\n<p>As well as the 7.x-1.x branch, there's the 8.x-2.x branch which supports Drupal 9 and 10, and previously Drupal 8.<\/p>\n\n<p>The most recent statistics show the module is currently used on 34,981 websites and is consistently around 35,000.<\/p>\n\n<h2 id=\"what-does-that-mean%3F\">What does that mean?<\/h2>\n\n<p>The module is considered feature complete, but I'm not ruling out any new additions.<\/p>\n\n<p>The main thing is ensuring that any changes don't break 35,000 websites!<\/p>\n\n<p>I do this by relying on the module's automated test suite and ensuring that tests are added for any features or bugs and that the tests are passing before any new release.<\/p>\n\n<h2 id=\"this-has-worked-well\">This has worked well<\/h2>\n\n<p>A few years ago, I committed a feature request to both versions. While it didn't include additional tests, I verified the existing functionality worked after resolving a large merge conflict by ensuring the original tests passed.<\/p>\n\n<p>More recently, a colleague and I refactored the module and split each override into its own class, making adding and maintaining overrides easier.<\/p>\n\n<p>Because the tests were still passing, we knew our refactor was successful and not causing regressions.<\/p>\n\n<h2 id=\"here%27s-the-thing\">Here's the thing<\/h2>\n\n<p>Having automated tests and ensuring they're always passing has allowed me to add features and refactor code that I wouldn't have done or had the confidence to do otherwise.<\/p>\n\n<p>It's great to have a popular module, but on the other hand, I don't want to break 35,000 websites which makes the tests invaluable.<\/p>\n\n        ",
+            "processed": "\n          <p>Note: The numbers within this post are taken from my <a href=\"/presentations\/tdd-test-driven-drupal\">Test-Driven Drupal talk<\/a>, in which I also talk about this.<\/p>\n\n<p>My first commit to the 7.x-1.x branch of the Override Node Options module was in March 2012. According to Drupal.org, the module was used on 9,212 websites then.<\/p>\n\n<p>As well as the 7.x-1.x branch, there's the 8.x-2.x branch which supports Drupal 9 and 10, and previously Drupal 8.<\/p>\n\n<p>The most recent statistics show the module is currently used on 34,981 websites and is consistently around 35,000.<\/p>\n\n<h2 id=\"what-does-that-mean%3F\">What does that mean?<\/h2>\n\n<p>The module is considered feature complete, but I'm not ruling out any new additions.<\/p>\n\n<p>The main thing is ensuring that any changes don't break 35,000 websites!<\/p>\n\n<p>I do this by relying on the module's automated test suite and ensuring that tests are added for any features or bugs and that the tests are passing before any new release.<\/p>\n\n<h2 id=\"this-has-worked-well\">This has worked well<\/h2>\n\n<p>A few years ago, I committed a feature request to both versions. While it didn't include additional tests, I verified the existing functionality worked after resolving a large merge conflict by ensuring the original tests passed.<\/p>\n\n<p>More recently, a colleague and I refactored the module and split each override into its own class, making adding and maintaining overrides easier.<\/p>\n\n<p>Because the tests were still passing, we knew our refactor was successful and not causing regressions.<\/p>\n\n<h2 id=\"here%27s-the-thing\">Here's the thing<\/h2>\n\n<p>Having automated tests and ensuring they're always passing has allowed me to add features and refactor code that I wouldn't have done or had the confidence to do otherwise.<\/p>\n\n<p>It's great to have a popular module, but on the other hand, I don't want to break 35,000 websites which makes the tests invaluable.<\/p>\n\n        ",
             "summary": null
         }
     ],