Make all links relative

Now the abs_to_rel module is enabled, links can be made relative so they
work on the current environment.

content/node.0f327d3d-33ce-498a-9234-6c1fe9f51d6a.json

@@ -82,9 +82,9 @@
     ],
     "body": [
         {
-            "value": "\n          <p>Before adding a new feature or change to a codebase, ask if it's really needed and consider its long-term implications.<\/p>\n\n<p>Code is easy to write, but needs to be maintained as newer language or framework features are added or have breaking changes.<\/p>\n\n<p>Something I've added recently to Build Configs was an option to use an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oliverdavies.uk\/daily\/2024\/01\/27\/gitignore-inclusive-or-exclusive\">inclusive or exclusive .gitignore file<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<p>Whilst it's only adding an if condition based on a value, it adds a separate path in my code and both need to be maintained.<\/p>\n\n<p>I've been thinking of adding <code>just<\/code> again to some projects instead of a <code>run<\/code> file, which would add separate files that need to be maintained and kept up-to-date with each other so both offer the same features.<\/p>\n\n<p>Is this something I want to maintain going forward? Does it add enough value to justify its maintenance?<\/p>\n\n<p>Different to a feature flag, which usually has a known lifespan, this could need be maintained for the whole lifespan of the application.<\/p>\n\n<p>On a client project, this could be having two sets of buttons with rounded and square corners.<\/p>\n\n<p>Do we need both?<\/p>\n\n<p>It could be the positioning of a title in a header. Fewer options mean there is less code to write and maintain.<\/p>\n\n<p>In a Drupal project, each choice could mean adding a different field, taxonomy term, or content or block type to achieve the desired result.<\/p>\n\n<p>The more we can achieve with fewer options means the application will be easier to maintain and work on in the future.<\/p>\n\n        ",
+            "value": "\n          <p>Before adding a new feature or change to a codebase, ask if it's really needed and consider its long-term implications.<\/p>\n\n<p>Code is easy to write, but needs to be maintained as newer language or framework features are added or have breaking changes.<\/p>\n\n<p>Something I've added recently to Build Configs was an option to use an <a href=\"/daily\/2024\/01\/27\/gitignore-inclusive-or-exclusive\">inclusive or exclusive .gitignore file<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<p>Whilst it's only adding an if condition based on a value, it adds a separate path in my code and both need to be maintained.<\/p>\n\n<p>I've been thinking of adding <code>just<\/code> again to some projects instead of a <code>run<\/code> file, which would add separate files that need to be maintained and kept up-to-date with each other so both offer the same features.<\/p>\n\n<p>Is this something I want to maintain going forward? Does it add enough value to justify its maintenance?<\/p>\n\n<p>Different to a feature flag, which usually has a known lifespan, this could need be maintained for the whole lifespan of the application.<\/p>\n\n<p>On a client project, this could be having two sets of buttons with rounded and square corners.<\/p>\n\n<p>Do we need both?<\/p>\n\n<p>It could be the positioning of a title in a header. Fewer options mean there is less code to write and maintain.<\/p>\n\n<p>In a Drupal project, each choice could mean adding a different field, taxonomy term, or content or block type to achieve the desired result.<\/p>\n\n<p>The more we can achieve with fewer options means the application will be easier to maintain and work on in the future.<\/p>\n\n        ",
             "format": "full_html",
-            "processed": "\n          <p>Before adding a new feature or change to a codebase, ask if it's really needed and consider its long-term implications.<\/p>\n\n<p>Code is easy to write, but needs to be maintained as newer language or framework features are added or have breaking changes.<\/p>\n\n<p>Something I've added recently to Build Configs was an option to use an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oliverdavies.uk\/daily\/2024\/01\/27\/gitignore-inclusive-or-exclusive\">inclusive or exclusive .gitignore file<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<p>Whilst it's only adding an if condition based on a value, it adds a separate path in my code and both need to be maintained.<\/p>\n\n<p>I've been thinking of adding <code>just<\/code> again to some projects instead of a <code>run<\/code> file, which would add separate files that need to be maintained and kept up-to-date with each other so both offer the same features.<\/p>\n\n<p>Is this something I want to maintain going forward? Does it add enough value to justify its maintenance?<\/p>\n\n<p>Different to a feature flag, which usually has a known lifespan, this could need be maintained for the whole lifespan of the application.<\/p>\n\n<p>On a client project, this could be having two sets of buttons with rounded and square corners.<\/p>\n\n<p>Do we need both?<\/p>\n\n<p>It could be the positioning of a title in a header. Fewer options mean there is less code to write and maintain.<\/p>\n\n<p>In a Drupal project, each choice could mean adding a different field, taxonomy term, or content or block type to achieve the desired result.<\/p>\n\n<p>The more we can achieve with fewer options means the application will be easier to maintain and work on in the future.<\/p>\n\n        ",
+            "processed": "\n          <p>Before adding a new feature or change to a codebase, ask if it's really needed and consider its long-term implications.<\/p>\n\n<p>Code is easy to write, but needs to be maintained as newer language or framework features are added or have breaking changes.<\/p>\n\n<p>Something I've added recently to Build Configs was an option to use an <a href=\"/daily\/2024\/01\/27\/gitignore-inclusive-or-exclusive\">inclusive or exclusive .gitignore file<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<p>Whilst it's only adding an if condition based on a value, it adds a separate path in my code and both need to be maintained.<\/p>\n\n<p>I've been thinking of adding <code>just<\/code> again to some projects instead of a <code>run<\/code> file, which would add separate files that need to be maintained and kept up-to-date with each other so both offer the same features.<\/p>\n\n<p>Is this something I want to maintain going forward? Does it add enough value to justify its maintenance?<\/p>\n\n<p>Different to a feature flag, which usually has a known lifespan, this could need be maintained for the whole lifespan of the application.<\/p>\n\n<p>On a client project, this could be having two sets of buttons with rounded and square corners.<\/p>\n\n<p>Do we need both?<\/p>\n\n<p>It could be the positioning of a title in a header. Fewer options mean there is less code to write and maintain.<\/p>\n\n<p>In a Drupal project, each choice could mean adding a different field, taxonomy term, or content or block type to achieve the desired result.<\/p>\n\n<p>The more we can achieve with fewer options means the application will be easier to maintain and work on in the future.<\/p>\n\n        ",
             "summary": null
         }
     ],