Move all files to tome/

tome/content/node.a2dbc5b2-ae56-4583-bc9f-ec0f70601eae.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+uuid:
+  - value: a2dbc5b2-ae56-4583-bc9f-ec0f70601eae
+langcode:
+  - value: en
+type:
+  - target_id: daily_email
+    target_type: node_type
+    target_uuid: 8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7
+revision_timestamp:
+  - value: '2025-05-11T09:00:20+00:00'
+revision_uid:
+  - target_type: user
+    target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849
+revision_log: {  }
+status:
+  - value: true
+uid:
+  - target_type: user
+    target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849
+title:
+  - value: '.gitignore or .gitallow'
+created:
+  - value: '2024-02-05T00:00:00+00:00'
+changed:
+  - value: '2025-05-11T09:00:20+00:00'
+promote:
+  - value: false
+sticky:
+  - value: false
+default_langcode:
+  - value: true
+revision_translation_affected:
+  - value: true
+path:
+  - alias: /daily/2024/02/05/gitignore-or-gitallow
+    langcode: en
+body:
+  - value: |
+      <p>Following last week's email on <a href="/daily/2024/01/27/gitignore-inclusive-or-exclusive">different ways to write .gitignore files</a>, friend of the list, Daniel Harper, sent me this reply (shared with permission):</p>
+
+      <blockquote>
+        <p>I had a debate once about this topic and we settled on ignore as the filename explicitly describes what it should be doing ie. It's not .gitallow 😆</p>
+      </blockquote>
+
+      <p>This is a good point.</p>
+
+      <p>What do people expect to see in a <code>.gitignore</code> file?</p>
+
+      <p>A list of directories and files to be ignored or allowed?</p>
+
+      <p>Based on the filename, it should be the former.</p>
+
+      <p>This would be clearer for people when they first open the file.</p>
+
+      <p>However, if you decide to use the allow approach instead, document it in an <a href="/daily/2022/09/23/adrs-technical-design-documents">ADR or design document</a> and why you decided to do it that way and provide context for people working on the codebase in the future.</p>
+
+              
+    format: full_html
+    processed: |
+      <p>Following last week's email on <a href="/daily/2024/01/27/gitignore-inclusive-or-exclusive">different ways to write .gitignore files</a>, friend of the list, Daniel Harper, sent me this reply (shared with permission):</p>
+
+      <blockquote>
+        <p>I had a debate once about this topic and we settled on ignore as the filename explicitly describes what it should be doing ie. It's not .gitallow 😆</p>
+      </blockquote>
+
+      <p>This is a good point.</p>
+
+      <p>What do people expect to see in a <code>.gitignore</code> file?</p>
+
+      <p>A list of directories and files to be ignored or allowed?</p>
+
+      <p>Based on the filename, it should be the former.</p>
+
+      <p>This would be clearer for people when they first open the file.</p>
+
+      <p>However, if you decide to use the allow approach instead, document it in an <a href="/daily/2022/09/23/adrs-technical-design-documents">ADR or design document</a> and why you decided to do it that way and provide context for people working on the codebase in the future.</p>
+
+              
+    summary: null
+field_daily_email_cta: {  }