Move all files to tome/
This commit is contained in:
parent
5675bcfc36
commit
674daab35b
2874 changed files with 0 additions and 0 deletions
105
tome/content/node.0fb3ebe0-46c3-4e9c-9961-e62aa512fab3.yml
Normal file
105
tome/content/node.0fb3ebe0-46c3-4e9c-9961-e62aa512fab3.yml
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
|
|||
uuid:
|
||||
- value: 0fb3ebe0-46c3-4e9c-9961-e62aa512fab3
|
||||
langcode:
|
||||
- value: en
|
||||
type:
|
||||
- target_id: daily_email
|
||||
target_type: node_type
|
||||
target_uuid: 8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7
|
||||
revision_timestamp:
|
||||
- value: '2025-05-11T09:00:36+00:00'
|
||||
revision_uid:
|
||||
- target_type: user
|
||||
target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849
|
||||
revision_log: { }
|
||||
status:
|
||||
- value: true
|
||||
uid:
|
||||
- target_type: user
|
||||
target_uuid: b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849
|
||||
title:
|
||||
- value: |
|
||||
Maintaining a module used on 35,000 Drupal websites
|
||||
created:
|
||||
- value: '2023-08-01T00:00:00+00:00'
|
||||
changed:
|
||||
- value: '2025-05-11T09:00:36+00:00'
|
||||
promote:
|
||||
- value: false
|
||||
sticky:
|
||||
- value: false
|
||||
default_langcode:
|
||||
- value: true
|
||||
revision_translation_affected:
|
||||
- value: true
|
||||
path:
|
||||
- alias: /daily/2023/08/01/maintaining-a-module-used-on-35000-drupal-websites
|
||||
langcode: en
|
||||
body:
|
||||
- value: |
|
||||
<p>Note: The numbers within this post are taken from my <a href="/presentations/tdd-test-driven-drupal">Test-Driven Drupal talk</a>, in which I also talk about this.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>My first commit to the 7.x-1.x branch of the Override Node Options module was in March 2012. According to Drupal.org, the module was used on 9,212 websites then.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>As well as the 7.x-1.x branch, there's the 8.x-2.x branch which supports Drupal 9 and 10, and previously Drupal 8.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The most recent statistics show the module is currently used on 34,981 websites and is consistently around 35,000.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<h2 id="what-does-that-mean%3F">What does that mean?</h2>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The module is considered feature complete, but I'm not ruling out any new additions.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The main thing is ensuring that any changes don't break 35,000 websites!</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>I do this by relying on the module's automated test suite and ensuring that tests are added for any features or bugs and that the tests are passing before any new release.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<h2 id="this-has-worked-well">This has worked well</h2>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>A few years ago, I committed a feature request to both versions. While it didn't include additional tests, I verified the existing functionality worked after resolving a large merge conflict by ensuring the original tests passed.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>More recently, a colleague and I refactored the module and split each override into its own class, making adding and maintaining overrides easier.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Because the tests were still passing, we knew our refactor was successful and not causing regressions.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<h2 id="here%27s-the-thing">Here's the thing</h2>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Having automated tests and ensuring they're always passing has allowed me to add features and refactor code that I wouldn't have done or had the confidence to do otherwise.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>It's great to have a popular module, but on the other hand, I don't want to break 35,000 websites which makes the tests invaluable.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
format: full_html
|
||||
processed: |
|
||||
<p>Note: The numbers within this post are taken from my <a href="/presentations/tdd-test-driven-drupal">Test-Driven Drupal talk</a>, in which I also talk about this.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>My first commit to the 7.x-1.x branch of the Override Node Options module was in March 2012. According to Drupal.org, the module was used on 9,212 websites then.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>As well as the 7.x-1.x branch, there's the 8.x-2.x branch which supports Drupal 9 and 10, and previously Drupal 8.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The most recent statistics show the module is currently used on 34,981 websites and is consistently around 35,000.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<h2 id="what-does-that-mean%3F">What does that mean?</h2>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The module is considered feature complete, but I'm not ruling out any new additions.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The main thing is ensuring that any changes don't break 35,000 websites!</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>I do this by relying on the module's automated test suite and ensuring that tests are added for any features or bugs and that the tests are passing before any new release.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<h2 id="this-has-worked-well">This has worked well</h2>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>A few years ago, I committed a feature request to both versions. While it didn't include additional tests, I verified the existing functionality worked after resolving a large merge conflict by ensuring the original tests passed.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>More recently, a colleague and I refactored the module and split each override into its own class, making adding and maintaining overrides easier.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Because the tests were still passing, we knew our refactor was successful and not causing regressions.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<h2 id="here%27s-the-thing">Here's the thing</h2>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Having automated tests and ensuring they're always passing has allowed me to add features and refactor code that I wouldn't have done or had the confidence to do otherwise.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>It's great to have a popular module, but on the other hand, I don't want to break 35,000 websites which makes the tests invaluable.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
summary: null
|
||||
field_daily_email_cta: { }
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue