docs(daily-email): add 2022-12-05
This commit is contained in:
parent
476639ba3a
commit
5f4aaac264
27
website/src/daily-emails/2022-12-05.md
Normal file
27
website/src/daily-emails/2022-12-05.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: >
|
||||
Outcomes or output
|
||||
pubDate: 2022-12-05
|
||||
permalink: >
|
||||
archive/2022/12/05/outcomes-or-output
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
I was reading a Twitter thread recently that [started with this tweet](https://twitter.com/allenholub/status/1594786089994067969).
|
||||
|
||||
TL;DR:
|
||||
|
||||
> "Measuring output (e.g. velocity) is a waste of time. It's outcomes you care about - customer happiness."
|
||||
|
||||
This is definitely something that I agree with.
|
||||
|
||||
I can't remember the last time I looked at an output burndown chart or a velocity score.
|
||||
|
||||
I'd rather focus on what outcomes have been delivered and adding value to clients and customers.
|
||||
|
||||
What features did we release, what bugs did we fix, and what impact and value did that provide?
|
||||
|
||||
What increased revenue or improved a customer's experience?
|
||||
|
||||
I may have a sprint or cycle where I only deliver one or two large tasks, but those are major features that have been requested, a bug affecting a user's experience, or a task that unblocks future tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
In that situation, my velocity may not be good and could be improved by working on multiple smaller tasks, but which outcomes provide the most value?
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue