Move all files to sculpin/
This commit is contained in:
parent
c5d71803a5
commit
0f61b4e9ee
1514 changed files with 0 additions and 0 deletions
35
sculpin/source/_posts/2024-01-16.md
Normal file
35
sculpin/source/_posts/2024-01-16.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: Daily or quarterly?
|
||||
date: 2024-01-16
|
||||
permalink: daily/2024/01/16/daily-or-quarterly
|
||||
snippet: |
|
||||
What if you could only deploy changes daily or quarterly? Which would you pick?
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- software-development
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Imagine this scenario.
|
||||
|
||||
You have two options on how frequently you can deploy code changes to your application.
|
||||
|
||||
Option 1: Every day.
|
||||
|
||||
Option 2: Once a quarter.
|
||||
|
||||
No more, no less.
|
||||
|
||||
I'd choose daily.
|
||||
|
||||
I much prefer to deploy changes as often as possible rather than waiting.
|
||||
|
||||
I'm much more confident when releasing small changes - even if it's a small refactor, such as changing a variable name or extracting a small helper method.
|
||||
|
||||
It might even seem too small to release.
|
||||
|
||||
But the smaller the release is, the easier it is to find and fix any issues, and knowing that the next release would only be the following day makes it easier to fix forward instead of rolling back a large release with months of changes.
|
||||
|
||||
## Here's the thing
|
||||
|
||||
Whilst it may seem counterintuitive initially, it's much less risky to release small changes often compared to large changes infrequently.
|
||||
|
||||
Which option would you choose?
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue