Remove the feeds module

content/node.80c27b8b-ebb6-486e-9fb8-a4d29ade396c.json

@@ -87,14 +87,5 @@
             "processed": "\n          <p>In PHPUnit, there are different ways to write test methods.<\/p>\n\n<p>The standard way is to use camel-case method names with a <code>test<\/code> prefix, for example:<\/p>\n\n<pre><code class=\"language-php\">public function testTheProjectNameShouldBeAString(): void\n{\n    \/\/ ...\n}\n<\/code><\/pre>\n\n<p>Another popular way, particularly in some frameworks, is to use snake-case method names:<\/p>\n\n<pre><code class=\"language-php\">\/** @test *\/\npublic function the_project_name_should_be_a_string(): void\n{\n    \/\/ ...\n}\n<\/code><\/pre>\n\n<p>This may be more readable but only works if the <code>@test<\/code> annotation is present.<\/p>\n\n<p>What if you need to add another annotation, such as <code>@dataProvider<\/code> to the test? Do you do multi-line docblocks everywhere, or mix and match single and multiple line docblocks depending on the test?<\/p>\n\n<h2 id=\"here%27s-the-thing\">Here's the thing<\/h2>\n\n<p>My preference switches between both ways of writing test methods.<\/p>\n\n<p>But, whichever way I write it, I write descriptive method names that explain what the test does - even if it means having a long method name.<\/p>\n\n<p>I avoid short and generic names like <code>testUpdate()<\/code>.<\/p>\n\n<p>People should be able to read the test name and understand what it does and what it's testing.<\/p>\n\n        ",
             "summary": null
         }
-    ],
-    "feeds_item": [
-        {
-            "imported": "1970-01-01T00:32:50+00:00",
-            "guid": null,
-            "hash": "05bef1d24f084368e652eb41e2831725",
-            "target_type": "feeds_feed",
-            "target_uuid": "90c85284-7ca8-4074-9178-97ff8384fe76"
-        }
     ]
 }