Remove the feeds module

content/node.59cd5b64-d1c8-4249-ab41-2106e25df543.json

@@ -87,14 +87,5 @@
             "processed": "\n          <p>Many development teams and projects use code coverage - e.g. how many lines of code are covered by automated tests - as an objective, and saying it must be 100% or another percentage.<\/p>\n\n<p>But is this an effective metric?<\/p>\n\n<p>In the same way as deleting failing tests to fix a pipeline, a code coverage amount can be faked.<\/p>\n\n<p>With this in mind, what if, instead of setting an objective such as 100% code coverage, you used it as a guideline?<\/p>\n\n<p>If you're working on a legacy project, what if you set a minimum code coverage amount as a guideline to ensure any new code has tests by not dropping under that level?<\/p>\n\n<p>Would that be better than saying every line of code needs to be covered?<\/p>\n\n<p>Code coverage is something I'm thinking of using more, so I want to know what you think.<\/p>\n\n        ",
             "summary": null
         }
-    ],
-    "feeds_item": [
-        {
-            "imported": "1970-01-01T00:32:50+00:00",
-            "guid": null,
-            "hash": "37779b8be562eca580a1d3eb2ead9f83",
-            "target_type": "feeds_feed",
-            "target_uuid": "90c85284-7ca8-4074-9178-97ff8384fe76"
-        }
     ]
 }