"value":"\n <p>Agile and Scrum have become standard approaches in software development.<\/p>\n\n<p>Work is planned and organised into iterations\/cycles\/sprints, usually lasting two weeks.<\/p>\n\n<p>As one sprint is being worked on, the next is usually already planned and the following one is being discussed.<\/p>\n\n<p>It's common for code deployments and releases to follow the same pattern.<\/p>\n\n<p>When a sprint is finished, the changes are released.<\/p>\n\n<p>But that means if a task is worked on at the start of the sprint, it won't be available for at least two weeks.<\/p>\n\n<p>It may be longer if the sprint is longer or if there are steps like manual testing that also happen.<\/p>\n\n<p>What if a change is needed or a bug is found?<\/p>\n\n<p>Is that going to be at least another two weeks before it can be addressed?<\/p>\n\n<p>Do you need to start using hotfixes and dealing with multiple branches and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oliverdavies.uk\/daily\/2025\/02\/18\/conflicts\">merge conflicts<\/a>?<\/p>\n\n<p>I suggest separating your planning and work schedules from your deployments.<\/p>\n\n<p>Deploy as often as possible, even during a sprint.<\/p>\n\n<p>You want your feedback loop to be as small and quick as possible.<\/p>\n\n<p>But, importantly, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oliverdavies.uk\/daily\/2023\/06\/21\/deployments-or-releases\">deploying code is different to releasing features<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<p>If you need to do manual testing, use feature flags to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oliverdavies.uk\/daily\/2022\/12\/07\/separating-releases-from-deployments-with-feature-flags\">separate deploying the code from releasing the feature<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<p>Then, when it's ready to go live, you only need to enable the feature flag - no code deployment needed.<\/p>\n\n ",
"processed":"\n <p>Agile and Scrum have become standard approaches in software development.<\/p>\n\n<p>Work is planned and organised into iterations\/cycles\/sprints, usually lasting two weeks.<\/p>\n\n<p>As one sprint is being worked on, the next is usually already planned and the following one is being discussed.<\/p>\n\n<p>It's common for code deployments and releases to follow the same pattern.<\/p>\n\n<p>When a sprint is finished, the changes are released.<\/p>\n\n<p>But that means if a task is worked on at the start of the sprint, it won't be available for at least two weeks.<\/p>\n\n<p>It may be longer if the sprint is longer or if there are steps like manual testing that also happen.<\/p>\n\n<p>What if a change is needed or a bug is found?<\/p>\n\n<p>Is that going to be at least another two weeks before it can be addressed?<\/p>\n\n<p>Do you need to start using hotfixes and dealing with multiple branches and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oliverdavies.uk\/daily\/2025\/02\/18\/conflicts\">merge conflicts<\/a>?<\/p>\n\n<p>I suggest separating your planning and work schedules from your deployments.<\/p>\n\n<p>Deploy as often as possible, even during a sprint.<\/p>\n\n<p>You want your feedback loop to be as small and quick as possible.<\/p>\n\n<p>But, importantly, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oliverdavies.uk\/daily\/2023\/06\/21\/deployments-or-releases\">deploying code is different to releasing features<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<p>If you need to do manual testing, use feature flags to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oliverdavies.uk\/daily\/2022\/12\/07\/separating-releases-from-deployments-with-feature-flags\">separate deploying the code from releasing the feature<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<p>Then, when it's ready to go live, you only need to enable the feature flag - no code deployment needed.<\/p>\n\n ",