oliverdavies.uk/content/node.84a6f9be-759c-42ea-815b-6b29a90b7742.json

{
    "uuid": [
        {
            "value": "84a6f9be-759c-42ea-815b-6b29a90b7742"
        }
    ],
    "langcode": [
        {
            "value": "en"
        }
    ],
    "type": [
        {
            "target_id": "daily_email",
            "target_type": "node_type",
            "target_uuid": "8bde1f2f-eef9-4f2d-ae9c-96921f8193d7"
        }
    ],
    "revision_timestamp": [
        {
            "value": "2025-05-11T09:00:26+00:00"
        }
    ],
    "revision_uid": [
        {
            "target_type": "user",
            "target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
        }
    ],
    "revision_log": [],
    "status": [
        {
            "value": true
        }
    ],
    "uid": [
        {
            "target_type": "user",
            "target_uuid": "b8966985-d4b2-42a7-a319-2e94ccfbb849"
        }
    ],
    "title": [
        {
            "value": "Suffixing names\n"
        }
    ],
    "created": [
        {
            "value": "2023-12-10T00:00:00+00:00"
        }
    ],
    "changed": [
        {
            "value": "2025-05-11T09:00:26+00:00"
        }
    ],
    "promote": [
        {
            "value": false
        }
    ],
    "sticky": [
        {
            "value": false
        }
    ],
    "default_langcode": [
        {
            "value": true
        }
    ],
    "revision_translation_affected": [
        {
            "value": true
        }
    ],
    "path": [
        {
            "alias": "\/daily\/2023\/12\/10\/suffixing-names",
            "langcode": "en"
        }
    ],
    "body": [
        {
            "value": "\n          <p>When writing code, it's common to suffix the class name with the type of class it is.<\/p>\n\n<p>I do this often for most types of classes, such as Controllers, EventListeners, Factories, Repositories and Builders.<\/p>\n\n<p>However, I don't always for value objects and data transfer objects (DTOs).<\/p>\n\n<p>Also, I don't always suffix interfaces with <code>Interface<\/code>.<\/p>\n\n<p>I've been re-reading the documentation for the Symfony Serializer component, which references both <code>NameConverterInterface<\/code> and <code>MyDto::class<\/code>.<\/p>\n\n<p>Whilst it does make the names more verbose, it does clarify what the class is used for.<\/p>\n\n<p>Symfony's coding standards and Drupal's PHP coding standards have conventions for this, but what do you think?<\/p>\n\n<p>Do you add suffixes to your class or interface names, or do you prefer the simplified versions?<\/p>\n\n        ",
            "format": "full_html",
            "processed": "\n          <p>When writing code, it's common to suffix the class name with the type of class it is.<\/p>\n\n<p>I do this often for most types of classes, such as Controllers, EventListeners, Factories, Repositories and Builders.<\/p>\n\n<p>However, I don't always for value objects and data transfer objects (DTOs).<\/p>\n\n<p>Also, I don't always suffix interfaces with <code>Interface<\/code>.<\/p>\n\n<p>I've been re-reading the documentation for the Symfony Serializer component, which references both <code>NameConverterInterface<\/code> and <code>MyDto::class<\/code>.<\/p>\n\n<p>Whilst it does make the names more verbose, it does clarify what the class is used for.<\/p>\n\n<p>Symfony's coding standards and Drupal's PHP coding standards have conventions for this, but what do you think?<\/p>\n\n<p>Do you add suffixes to your class or interface names, or do you prefer the simplified versions?<\/p>\n\n        ",
            "summary": null
        }
    ],
    "feeds_item": [
        {
            "imported": "2025-05-11T09:00:26+00:00",
            "guid": null,
            "hash": "5c2783e9ca75aee09edea870a5cf5f42",
            "target_type": "feeds_feed",
            "target_uuid": "90c85284-7ca8-4074-9178-97ff8384fe76"
        }
    ]
}